California Judge Rules Against Human Health


Monsanto not required to put cancer warning label on its Roundup weed killer.

By Tilton Adler

In an unsettling albeit not entirely unsurprising decision by California’s Eastern District Court, Senior Judge William B. Shubb ruled in favor of repeat offender Bayer AG subsidiary Monsanto. In National Association of Wheat Growers, et al. v. Zeise, et al., he ruled that California is permanently barred from requiring glyphosate-based products including Monsanto’s Roundup weed killer to be labeled as cancer-causing, under California’s Proposition 65.

The ruling is especially controversial, as glyphosate has been widely accepted by the public and many scientists as carcinogenic, though still under scientific debate with study findings apparently dependent upon which agency or group has funded the research. In 2015 the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer determined glyphosate could “probably” cause cancer. But in 2019, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that a risk of cancer “does not exist” and, later, that “no risks . . . to human health exist” when the product is used according to label instructions. Judge Shubb said, “The great weight of evidence indicates that glyphosate is not known to cause cancer.”

My Stretch of Texas Ground movie

On the other hand, in late June 2020, Monsanto was ordered to pay $10 billion to settle cancer lawsuits. Bayer was facing “tens of thousands of claims linking the weed-killer to cases of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma” according to The New York Times. “Some of the money is set aside for future cases,” the Times added.

Nourishing Diets, Morell
New at the AFP Store, by the author of Nourishing Fats

When Bayer bought Monsanto, it knew it was going to inherit these lawsuits. (Bayer paid $63 billion for Monsanto.) Journalist Patricia Cohen said, “The settlement covers an estimated 95,000 cases and includes $1.25 billion for potential future claims from Roundup customers who may develop . . . non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.”

But this case wasn’t really about whether or not glyphosate is toxic. Rather, it boiled down to whether Monsanto’s First Amendment and commercial “free speech rights” were being infringed upon by the people’s demand for the company to adhere to labeling requirements set forth under Proposition 65, which mandates that all products known to be hazardous or cancer-causing be labeled as such—another despicable example of the nation’s judicial system protecting the “rights” of corporations over consumers.

Proposition 65, which requires businesses to provide warnings to Californians about significant exposures to chemicals that cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm, became law in November 1986, when California voters approved it by a massive 63-37% margin.

In direct contradiction to the will of the people, however, the court’s ruling again reinforced that the corporation’s right to “free speech” is more vehemently protected than the right of consumers, voters, grassroots campaign organizers, and farmers in California and across the United States to know the dangers of a product and have those dangers clearly marked for consumers on the label.

How can juries and health experts deem again and again that Roundup causes cancer but one lone judge ban the obvious labeling requirements of Proposition 65? How many more examples of the judicial system being manipulated by corporate lobbyists, harming Americans in the pro cess, do we have to see before something is done? The cornerstone of our democracy is being eroded. Big Ag and big money pockets continue to silence the voices—and deleteriously affect the good health—of people around the globe, not just in the U.S.

Bayer AG’s lobbying budget for 2019 was $9.14 million, according to the investigative website “” That’s a lot of money to grease a lot of palms in a lot of places.

4 Comments on California Judge Rules Against Human Health

  1. Tilton Adler wrote a great article!
    Twenty one countries including France, Austria, Belgium, Denmark have banned or restricted the use of RoundUp. The EU itself has restricted the use. Hundreds of studies have shown that Glyphosate is dangerous. It is linked to a lot more than Hodgkins Lymphoma and does serious damage to the environment.

    It is a herbicide not an insecticide and is absorbed into the very fiber on whatever it is sprayed. Then, we eat it.

  2. The true harm of glyphosate IS known.
    Any discussion of food safety should start with the definition of the word “safe”.
    If you smoke cigarettes, drink alcohol, eat junk food, and think that DDT, Agent Orange, and
    PCBs are safe, then you will probably consider glyphosate to be safe.
    However, for the rest of us, we already know that glyphosate harms human health.
    Monsanto itself tells us this.
    The debate on whether glyphosate does or does not cause cancer is misleading and a distraction from what is currently known .
    Monsanto says that glyphosate acts via the shikimate metabolic pathway ( that is why it is so effective according to them )
    It does a really good job of killing organisms with this pathway ( Monsanto spends a lot of money advertising just what an effective poison glyphosate is ).
    So any organism with a shikimate pathway is going to be harmed or killed.
    If you know even the basics of human biology, then you are aware that ALL the
    beneficial bacteria that make up our immune systems have the shikimate pathway, so glyphosate damages or kills them.
    It may not directly cause diseases, but glyphosate weakens human immune
    systems by killing our gut bacteria, thus leaving us more susceptible to
    a whole host of diseases.
    So whether Roundup (glyphosate ) directly causes cancer or not will be debated for a long
    time, but we just do NOT need to be ingesting anything which weakens our defenses.
    However, if you want to, you can be like a lab rat in Monsanto’s on-going experiments, ….keeping in mind that real lab rats will have one advantage over you in that they do not have
    to PAY to be poisoned.

  3. I’m 66 years old. I was raised in a farming community. Roundup has been used here since it first hit the market. NOT ONE case of cancer has been associated with its use.
    I have used it to kill off the duck weed in my fishing pond. Every member of my (extended)family has eaten fish from this pond. No cancer.
    Lawyers seem to be the MAJOR cause of cancer.

  4. It is so sad to say , but we now live in a Nation of decievers and dangerous liars. There are so many lies and so much mis information today, one does not know who is telling the truth anymore. I live at The Villages, Florida and I have never witnessed so many demonic liars that care nothing about Truth. Nothing about Our Constitution And will tell you the wall is black when it is white. The only way We get to the Truth is place these liars under Oath in a court Of law under penalties of Perjury. They go to Prison when they lie. this is why Martha Stewart went to prison. For Perjury.

Comments are closed.