A new book exclusively from AMERICAN FREE PRESS!
First There Was Churchill’s War . . .
Then There Was Hitler’s War . . .
And Now Possibly the Greatest Book Ever on WWII . . .
THE ORIGINS, AFTERMATH & ATROCITIES OF WORLD WAR II
Establishment historians characterize National Socialist Germany as a uniquely barbaric, vile and criminal regime that was totally responsible for starting World War II and carrying out some of the most heinous war crimes in world history. Germany’s War by John Wear refutes this characterization of Germany, bringing history into accord with the facts.
Germany’s War documents that the Allied leaders of the Soviet Union, Great Britain and the United States were primarily responsible for starting and prolonging World War II—costing million of lives. Far from being the conqueror of Europe, Adolf Hitler saved it from Stalin.
The leaders of Great Britain and America also adopted policies designed to force war with Germany. Britain’s unconditional guarantee to Poland led to horrific acts of violence against Poland’s ethnic Germans and, thus, Germany was forced to invade Poland to end these atrocities. Franklin Roosevelt’s numerous provocations, including a shoot-on-sight policy against German shipping and leaked plans of a U.S. invasion of Germany, forced Germany to declare war on the U.S. despite Hitler’s desire for peace.
This book also reports the Allied mass murder of the German people after the end of World War II during which the Allies—led by General Dwight D. Eisenhower—murdered approximately 1.5 million German prisoners of war through intentional starvation and exposure to the elements. Probably a minimum 2.1 million ethnic Germans expelled from their homes also died in what was supposed to be an “orderly and humane” relocation. Finally, the Allies murdered millions of additional Germans through intentional starvation after the war ended—plus much, much more.
Deluxe softcover, 521 pages
Take a Peek Inside Germany’s War . . .
FROM THE INTRODUCTION
By John Wear
My father was a pilot in 50 bombing missions for the U.S. Eighth Air Force during World War II. When I was a boy I asked him if he had killed anyone during the war. He replied, “I hope I didn’t kill anyone.” In regard to his participation in the Normandy invasion, he said: “You cannot imagine how big of an operation that was. People on the ground were being killed!” My father repeatedly stated he hated war and that “War is hell.” He also expressed his opinion that the Germans had fought extraordinarily hard during the war.
I have always wondered how wars have continuously existed throughout history when virtually everyone agrees with my father that “War is hell.” In regard to the origin of World War II, a fascinating discussion occurred during the Nuremberg trials between American psychologist Dr. Gustave Gilbert and former German Reichsmarschall Hermann Goering. On the evening of April 18, 1946, in Goering’s jail cell, Dr. Gilbert expressed his belief that the common people are not very thankful for leaders who bring them war and destruction. Goering responded:
“Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back in one piece? Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.”
Dr. Gilbert told Goering that there is one difference. Gilbert said:
“In a democracy the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare war.”
“Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”
Special Introductory Price: $25
The three active participants who did not get banned on that Amazon discussion thread were John Wear, M. Rich and Jeffrey Davis. John Wear is the only revisionist of the three; M. Rich and Jeffrey Davis both espouse traditional historical views.
We want you to be aware of John Wear’s website at wearswar.wordpress.com. Everyone is invited to receive free notifications of updates by email. In just six weeks we already have 80 website followers, well over 7000 hits and now a growing following on Twitter. Furthermore, John Wear has had three articles published by Inconvenient History at https://www.inconvenienthistory.com/columnists/2873. The ideas for the last few hugely successful and popular articles came directly from his participation in Amazon discussion threads.
God Bless us.
We may not survive another “terrifying peace”.
Slight economy with the full picture Flopsy (Fiona) but that was always the case, wasn’t it?
As I recall, the only main contributor to that comments thread NOT to get banned was the self-published ‘revisionist’. You never were in touch with irony, either.
You got banned because your relentless campaign of bigotry (and projecting mental illnesses onto anyone who isolated and exposed the myriad lies you told to further that bigotry) finally caught up with you.
The other three people who got banned were people who were calling out your lies and bigotry. So you can play the victim all you like. As I recall, you always did. I copied vast swathes of that gigantic thread including the bit where, after you were banned, you returned under the name ‘-‘ and went into some kind of meltdown, throwing stones at all and sundry and complaining about your problems and childhood which may, or may not, be at the root of of you growing up to be such a hateful, dishonest individual.
I was communicating on an Amazon UK discussion with John and Amazon banned me. When I asked the communities team why they came up with a non-valid reason “spite”. I’m truly shocked. I have had a small taste of what revisionists have to go through and it is very disturbing.
Regarding his recommendation of a book that exposes the coverup of prior knowledge of Roosevelt’s administration on Pearl Harbor, John Wear’s Germany’s War reveals a lot more than just a cover up on the part of the administration, just one topic of many censored topics in the book which I highly recommend in my previous review.
I particularly enjoyed also Wear’s writing style for its clarity of expression, its fair analysis to all sides, and attention to evidence. He is a pleasure to read.
My hope is that, for their own benefit, Germans embrace this book in the manner it deserves for the truth alone will set them free.
Will this be available on Amazon UK?
….some background information on “Mein Kampf” and the various translations and touched on what is called “das Zweites Buch” (the Second Book) or “Volume II” and why we need to be skeptical with regards to its contents. No such book was ever authorized for publication by Hitler and the NSADP. As with the Hossbach document, the manuscript was found under suspicious circumstances and whose background and motives must be taken into account.
Wayne discusses this in the interview you’ll find at the above link. However, this same person who has a low opinion of the book presented here by AFP, wants us to read another book filled with information most people should know since it was released that FDR knew about Pearl Harbor. What we don’t get in the Jew news is what this book Germany’s War will present. Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany 1945 to 1947 will also shed some light on what we’re not told by the mainstream historians.
No doubt history is grey rather than black and white, but the character of Hitler can be seen long before the war. In the Night of the Long Knives he unleashed terror against his GERMAN opponents in an orgy of murder. In a less well known little bit of wet work he had an associate from his down-and-out Vienna period bumped off when the foolish man made the mistake of talking about the time.
I can’t be bothered to read this book, but I guess Chamberlain’s two flights to Hitler and his “I have here a piece of paper from Herr Hitler..’ will be cast as a super ingenious British plot to lure Germany into war.
The author will have another problem: In Mein Kampf, Hitler said he was going to seize lebensraum in the east, so the evil allies pushed him into doing what he said he was going to do.
By the way, if you want a REAL read, try and find John Toland’s ‘Infamy’, which meticulously documents the coverup of the Roosevelt’s administration foreknowledge of Japan’s attack.