By Pete Papaherakles —
The mass school shootings in Pakistan on December 16 have generated controversy about media coverage of the story and rekindled accusations that the mainstream media lied about the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings two years ago. One of the alleged victims in Pakistan seems to have been killed twice, as he was also one of the 20 children reportedly killed at Sandy Hook.
During a televised report by the BBC of the Pakistan shootings, the reporter is seen walking in front of a wall with pictures of the children killed there. One of the pictures is none other than Noah Pozner, one of the more oft-displayed faces of the 20 children allegedly killed at the Sandy Hook school shootings, in Newtown, Connecticut, on December 14, 2012. BBC has admitted in a short article that “the montage of images includes the photo of a young boy, Noah Pozner, who died in the Sandy Hook massacre in the United States in 2012,” but made no further comments.
Noah Pozner’s picture has circulated all across Pakistan, including at several vigils held for the slain children. Bizarrely, Pakistani authorities, officials at the Army Public School (where the massacre occurred) and the media have identified the boy in the photo as Huzaifa Huxaifa. According to website “Islamhelpline.net,” “The name Hudhaifa is derived from the rootword ‘hazaf,’ which means to erase something. The name spells ‘erased’ in two different ways.”
Despite the Pozner photo anomaly, no one is actually questioning the veracity of the tragic school massacre in Pakistan. Unlike Sandy Hook, photos and videos were shown of the dead children on the scene, including blood, gore, rescue squad members, police, grieving parents and a scene of general pandemonium.
Many researchers over the past two years have felt that Sandy Hook lacked the transparency necessary to prove it believable and left many unanswered questions. They have pointed fingers at the Connecticut police, the government, first responders and what have come to be called “crisis actors,” but mostly they have blamed the media for spreading false stories and disinformation and fabricating what they call the Sandy Hook hoax.
One of these people is filmmaker and author William Brandon Shanley. He has launched a wave of lawsuits for more than $1 trillion against big media over their Sandy Hook school shooting coverage. The New York Times, Associated Press, the Hartford Courant and The Newtown Bee are being sued for $10 billion in punitive damages.
Shanley’s lawsuit says the media conspired to commit fraud and terrorism. “This fraud involved lying to the public, faking news, publishing one-sided news reports, censoring reality, suppressing facts and deliberately skewing the news to shift public perceptions,” he argued.
In an interview with AMERICAN FREE PRESS on December 29, Shanley said he believes Americans have been lied to about Sandy Hook.
“I have filed lawsuits against the media in U.S. District Court in New Haven for fraud and terrorism,” he said.
Shanley believes that “the media conspired to brainwash the public into thinking a lone gunman drill known as the ‘Sandy Hook Massacre’ was real, when in fact it was a staged FEMA [Federal Emergency Management Agency] National Level Exercise Event.”
Shanley pointed to two of the main documents he includes in his lawsuit.
“One is the photo that was on the front page of all the newspapers, magazines and on every TV channel,” explained Shanley. “Everyone has seen this picture of a dozen or so children supposedly being evacuated from Sandy Hook School. The children are shown walking single file in a parking lot with their hands on each other’s shoulder while a policewoman is guiding them. Have you seen that picture? Everyone has seen that picture. But guess what? That picture was completely staged by Shannon Hick of The Newtown Bee. It wasn’t even taken on that day. You can tell that the children are not even wearing winter clothes and there is no frost on the ground as there was on December 14. Not a single child is wearing any winter clothes, not even one coat or jacket. That’s because the photo was taken either on November 12 or on October 17 during a drill conducted at Sandy Hook. Other panned out pictures of this photo-op event show that only these 10 to 15 kids are on the scene along with other bystanders. Where are the other 585 children?”
Shanley said the other evidence he has is the video footage from the dash cams in the police cars that showed up at Sandy Hook School that morning.
“The cameras have a running time stamp starting from 9:37 a.m. and running till 12:49 p.m. and show the entire school and parking lot, yet they show absolutely no evacuation activity taking place that morning, nor do they record purported evacuation activity at specific times as recorded in the official Sandy Hook report,” he said. “In at least 36 documented instances, the evacuation activity events reported on the official Sandy Hook report are not reflected in any of the three dash cams pointed at the specific direction of the school building cited in the report.”
The iconic picture of the children being evacuated was allegedly taken at 10:16 a.m. on December 14, 2012. Once again, there is no such activity recorded by any of the three dash cams, which scoped the entire school and parking lot. Aerial video footage taken of the school grounds by news helicopters also do not show any evacuation activity.
It is doubtful that Shanley’s pro se lawsuit will get any traction, as he lacks the funds to proceed with such an ambitious undertaking. Furthermore, since the interview was taken, Shanley’s whereabouts are unknown, as he has mysteriously disappeared.
Pete Papaherakles is a writer and political cartoonist for AFP and is also AFP’s outreach director. Pete is interested in getting AFP writers and editors on the podium at patriotic events. Call him at 202-544-5977 if you know of an event you think AFP should attend.
If you take the fact none of these stories confront that the homes in this area just about every one was paid off on christmas day 2009. That is from the county assessors office most of the homes sold for pretty good amounts of money but less than estimated value Then had major upgrades where did the money come from and how was it paid on Christmas day? Of course because of the upgrades they are worth much more now! Has to be in the billions of dollars! There were videos on youtube about this I went to the county site on my own and it was on there exactly as they said! Interesting thing is alot of gun manufacturers are in Connecticut! I believe this was a win win either way if the government takes the gunn rights or not they boosted the economy by selling a record number of guns! A record numbers of background checks money going to the Federal government and the State also the state also got property in the area!
From the helicopter view the kids were walking around the school and not away from it, and people seem to be walking in circles. Explain that! Hoax to get dumb people to give up liberties for freedom…Benjamin Franklin once said: “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”
Whatever became of this???
Question: Who are the shills? The ones who say it was a hoax or the ones who deny it was a hoax? You decide.
Anyone with half of a free mind knows the correct answer.
Sandy Hook had donation sites up days prior to the shooting.
What do we need to do?
There are a bunch of brave souls that crash Bilderberg meetings. Some follow these war criminal bankers around and drop camera bombs on them often. And that’s good. But we need to increase in numbers. And to prevent them from trying to tighten down the screws on us, we need to continuously “remind” the police and military that we are armed to the teeth in weapons and will use them if it ever comes down to it. Because without an army, the bankers have NOTHING. And THAT my friends is where our focus needs to be. The strongest army survives.
THE STRONGEST ARMY SURVIVES!
Let’s all become one big army. Forget all the divisive new reports that are designed to break us all apart. We can solve the petty issues at another time. For now, we all need to realize that the future is at stake and it affects all of us. Try to find the common ground. And we can exterminate the criminals and their whores from the world.
Sandy Hook Exposed—Fake Photo Revealed
ORIGINAL PHOTO AT 1:40 IN THIS LINK http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=2…
Thanks to “EnterThe5t4rz” for exposing the obvious “Parker Family” photo editing. If you are not familiar with this family please watch our first video.
5. Sandy Hook? Shocking Photos
THIS STAGED EVENT IS NOW EXPOSED AS A FALSE FLAG SHOOTING USED TO TRY TO DISARM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE…
HEADS NEED TO ROLL…THIS IS TREASON.
Last time I checked, there were NO Sandy Hook lawsuits…why?
At least someone in the government didn’t lie to cover it up.
— Mark Twain
Variation on that theme: “Never try to teach Mark Glenn and Keith Johnson to think…”
There’s an excellent Sandy Hook debunking video, entitled “We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook.”
If you’ve never heard about it, then there’s a good reason for that. As soon as it pops up on the Internet, it is promptly taken down. If one were of a suspicious bent, one could get the idea that TPTB don’t want us to watch it.
However, it has not been completely scrubbed from the Internet.
Why not just agree to disagree? None of us doubts there have been many false flags (such as 9/11), even false-flag assassinations (both Kennedys and Martin Luther King); maybe this is one of them, maybe not….
We all will concede that a huge push for gun control came (and went) instantly after SH. So yes, it is legit to at least study the question if it was a false flag.
I have enormous respect for researcher and Ivy League graduate Sofia Smallstorm, who has done fabulous, FACTUAL and fascinating work on 9/11, chemtrails and Sandy Hook; this is her video on the SH subject, and I might note that she lived in the Sandy Hook area, unlike, I suspect, all of us.
(Rumor has it that the area is so Jewish and so CIA it should be called Sandy Hooknose and Jewtown.)
If you are wondering who I am.
Now here’s someone who’s really done his homework. Every point you make is spot-on. I had almost forgotten about Parker’s no-legged girl…(-: Maybe Keith Johnson can learn a few things from you.
The frost issue is a minor point. There are at least half a dozen other reasons that the Shannon Hicks photo is a fake. The main reason however is that it is not shown on any of the dash-cams at 10:09 AM as Miss Hicks claims, or at any other time, hence it never happened that morning.
The redacted segments of the video do not occur at any of the times that the official report claims evacuation activity was taking place. Also, the redacted segments last for only 3-4 seconds. Not nearly long enough for a group of children to walk across the parking lot. Besides, why would footage of evacuating children be redacted? To add further doubts about the veracity of the whole story? To protect the children’s identity you might say. Why then is their identity not protected in the Shannon Hicks photo? It just doesn’t add up.
It’s irrelevant whether there were 600 children or 450 children evacuating the school. The dash-cams showed NO CHILDREN evacuating the school.
Aerial footage of the school did not begin until after 11:00 AM? There was aerial footage as early as 9:39 AM, only 3 minutes after the police showed up, filming the police chase of the men running in the woods. The evacuations allegedly took place between 10:00 and 10:30 AM.
Keith, maybe it’s YOU who hasn’t done your homework.
First: You say “Noah Pozner’s picture never appeared in the wake of the Peshawar, Pakistan school massacre.”
This is a lie. It appeared on BBC and BBC also wrote an article admitting that it appeared on BBC. I have provided links for both.
Second: You say Shanley is crazy, Shanley is in jail, Shanley’s lawsuit fell apart. I don’t care about Shanley. The issue here is not Shanley but the accusations of his lawsuit. The Shannon Hicks photo is a fake because it could not have been taken at 10:09 AM on Dec. 14, 2012. It is not shown on any of the three dash-cams at the 10:09 time marker. Case closed.
Don’t waste your time, or ours, posting an update with the official documents of the 2nd dismissal because it is irrelevant. We all knew that the pro se lawsuits never had a chance in the first place.
The last I knew Keith was from Canada, at least when I was “following” The Ugly Truth.
Was Keith living in Canada? I heard he is from Tennessee. I have had my run-ins with Mark Glenn; yes I believe he is some kind of agent. Why you may ask? Simply because he is a money-hungry piece of crap. He would sell his own mother for a buck. As for Johnson, I am not sure if he is an agent. I know he is a Mark Glenn b*tch.
After what Keith’s good buddy, Mark Glenn (The Ugly Truth) did to me when I questioned his intentions, etc., I would not trust Keith for anything!
In fact, after what was done to me (read comment below), I personally think Keith Johnson, and Mark Glenn (The Ugly Truth) are actually agents for the government/s (Canada/US)! Of course, I am assuming that Keith still lives in Canada!
What, nothing to say about how your best buddy, Mark Glenn (The Ugly Truth) tried to have me set up to go to jail by using his friend Patricia Goldstein? Good thing I caught on to that whole cigarette scam when I did, huh?
Isn’t it funny how even after being told they were not friends anymore, some of the things I had told Patricia Goldstein in private phone conversations wound up being spouted by Mark Glenn on Tia Tequila’s former webpage?
And you think you have ANY credibility?
The author of this article should be ashamed of themselves.
It’s insulting to ALL of the Newtown families to even discuss this matter.
But if you are going to write about it, at least get your facts from someone with over 20 years of investigative legal experience.
Regards, CW Wade
Noah Pozner’s picture never appeared in the wake of the Peshawar, Pakistan school massacre.
That was just Photoshop bunk created by knuckle-dragging hoaxers trying to prove that the country of Pakistan is in leagues with the Connecticut State Police for the purposes of pulling a massive gun control hoaxtard conspiracy.
As usual, I’ve thoroughly debunked that nonsense.
Hey, Jerry? There are NO Life Star helicopters in Danbury. They are HQed in Hartford and you are repeating lies told by Wolfgang Halbig.
I first subscribed to The Spotlight just before the Oklahoma bombing occurred. I was new to this level of conspiracy, but was amazed and impressed with how little I recognized beforehand and how much these guys were on to things. The Spotlight was right on.
But Keith has me very suspicious. He almost seems like he is working for the other side. Pete is right on, like the gang was in Oklahoma in ’96, was it?
I can’t help but feel that AFP has lost its edge on this stuff. Perhaps we should all discuss the “rules of evidence” in the future, knowing that confessions are not realistic, so what should we expect?
Cynicism only goes so far. But when too many things stick out as seemingly not credible such as Oklahoma or JFK, or RFK, then we need to get on the story. AFP was trying to be cautious and credible and I understand that, but really, Sandy Hook smelled from the very start. AFP has been a little bit of a disappointment. I’d like to see some repentance and us being a little bit less gun-shy, so to speak. Take it as you will. But 9-11 smelled bad to me and I was working at the Portland Maine jetport where two of the terrorists were said to board. I had no access to The Spotlight and did not know about AFP, but I knew immediately that 9-11 was BS.
I read my father’s subscription but I had turned him on to The Spotlight/AFP. I hope AFP will perhaps give this some more thought and review. For me, Sandy Hook is a slam dunk guilty. Where is that verdict in AFP?
It has the appearance that other “freedom fighters” have outdone and outpaced AFP and with no subscription charge, even. Could this have been a reason why AFP seems to struggle right now? Has AFP lost some of its shine? I hope they will consider getting it back. Maybe you need a few replacement investigators/writers who still got the stomach for heavy-hitting and controversy. Some things to consider. I still support AFP but I am concerned for AFP.
I can’t help but wonder how much you and Mark Glenn (The Ugly Truth) are getting paid to spout your BS about Sandy Hook being a real event?
By the way, ask Mark Glenn (The Ugly Truth) if he has used Patricia Goldstein to try and set up (to go to jail) anymore people who have exposed him for the fraud he really is?
How dare you criticize dozens of facts of our government and we cannot even challenge them!! Such as 911.
We have MILLIONS of Truthers of scientists, college professors, top military officers, architects, engineers, and Pete Corral, the Seattle Seahawks Super Bowl Champion coach, and millions more like me…….that demand the truth.
Did anyone know the a third building “fell down” all by itself six hours after the WTC buildings??
The federal government is full of corruption and the truth will set us free!! Righteous is coming!!
Here’s a video from a fellow researcher that proves Shanley wrong.
Shanley said there should be FROST on the ground, PETE? Really? Did you check into that claim? The temperature was between 34° and 40° F between 10am and 11am.
See for yourself.
According to USA Today meteorologist Bob Swanson:
Q: Can frost occur at temperatures above 32°F?
A: No, frost is defined as a layer of ice that forms on surfaces that are at or below 32°F.
Shanley bases his claim on a photo taken near the fire house. In that photo, there is frost on the ground. However, that photo was taken on December 15th…NOT the 14th like Shanley and Jim Fetzer claim. At 8am in the morning on DECEMBER 15th, the temperature was 22° F.
See for yourself.
You can see I’m right by following this link. The photo and caption are in the last post on the page.
Spongebob Squarepants is more realistic than Sandy Hook.
Keith Johnson, why is this article a disgrace?