Maker of Shingles Vaccine Faces Lawsuits

A legal action against pharmaceutical giant Merck is shedding more light on vaccination dangers. Among the side effects listed in the warnings on packaging of Zostavax, a vaccination advertised to prevent shingles, are necrotizing retinitis, a severe eye disorder, and shingles. 

By James Spounias

A group of lawsuits that allege pharmaceutical giant Merck’s Zostavax—a vaccine that is purported to prevent herpes zoster (shingles)—caused damage is shedding light on the possible dangers of this highly advertised medical treatment.

In 2015, sales of Zostavax topped $749 million.

Trial lawyer Marc Bern reports he is gathering “thousands of complaints” yet to be filed in Philadelphia. Bern told pharmaceutical news website “FiercePharma,” “I think Merck has failed terribly . . . to warn about the very serious side effects and the failure of the vaccine to do what they claim it does.”

Bern filed what is believed to be the first lawsuit against Merck. Plaintiff Jorja Bentley, from Nevada, claims that Merck failed to warn of the risk of viral infection and that she suffered a headache, dizziness, and blurred vision shortly after receiving the vaccine. She stated that she continues to suffer from injury to her right eye, elevated blood pressure, headaches, and dizziness.

Bug Out While You Still Can! Learn More…

Bern stated: “We’ve been looking at this potential case for some time, and we believe it is highly meritorious. We believe the vaccine is at best 50% effective. Either it is not effective, or it has caused shingles and other issues, like in this case, where it has caused a serious [eye] complication.”

The fact that Zostavax may be implicated in eye-damage claims became better known when Merck got permission from the FDA in 2016 to include a warning that reads, “Eye Disorders: necrotizing retinitis (patients on immunosuppressive therapy).”

Tellingly, another side effect of the shingles vaccine is shingles. According to an Aug. 28, 2014 approval letter, the FDA granted Merck’s request “to include ‘infections and infestations: Herpes zoster (vaccine strain)’ and to update the patient package insert to include ‘shingles’ in the ‘What are the possible side effects of Zostavax?’ section.” In 2011, “gastro-intestinal disorders: nausea” was added as well.

Liberty Stickers

Most claims against vaccine makers never make it to court because the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 created a compensation program for vaccine injuries, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), run through the Department of Health and Human Services.

Many, but not all, vaccines are registered with the VICP, and because Zostavax is not registered, individuals are allowed to pursue litigation against Merck.

The VICP reviews vaccine injury claims, which are not limited to childhood vaccines. Roughly $3 billion has been awarded to victims since its creation in the 1980s, even though nearly two out of three claims are denied compensation.

Vaccine skeptics have plenty to say about the shingles vaccine.

Anne Dachel, media editor for “AgeOfAutism.com,” which is a website devoted to assisting those who believe that autism is an environmentally induced illness, interviewed Dr. Kenneth Stoller, an integrative physician who practices in San Francisco. Dr. Stoller is the author of Incurable Me, a book that exposes some of the darkest secrets of the medical industry.

Stoller told Ms. Dachel that there is “zero credible safety data” on vaccines.

“Vaccines are not tested for safety against a saline placebo,” he said. “They are tested against a solution that contains all of the adjuvants, metals, DNA, and other toxins etc., but just minus the infectious disease itself—in this case the varicella virus. So the safety data and adverse event data Merck cites in their package does not have a lot of meaning.”

How our immune systems respond to viruses cannot be reduced to the simplistic idea that a vaccine will protect us against a virus, and that those who are unvaccinated pose a risk to those who may be immune compromised. Introducing live or dead viruses into our system, by injection or orally, with or without “dangerous adjuvants,” is not the answer to fighting disease, according to some medical professionals.

Ms. Dachel posted a statement by Robert Krakow, former prosecutor and co-author of “Unanswered Questions from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: A Review of Compensated Cases of Vaccine-Induced Brain Injury,” a 2011 article published in Pace Environmental Law Review.

Krakow, now in private practice, handles vaccine injury claims and gave this statement to Ms. Dachel: “Given the obvious risk of serious injury from the Zostavax vaccine, any person over 50 should proceed with caution regarding the commercially promoted recommendation to get this vaccine. While shingles can be serious in rare cases, my view is that efforts to maintain good health and a strong immune system will serve us better in preventing shingles than obtaining this vaccine, which has the undeniable risk of serious injury.

There are almost 5,000 reports of adverse events after Zostavax. The vaccine contains substances that can provoke autoimmunity. . . . As with many other vaccines, I am not convinced that the vaccine or its components have been properly tested. The promotion of Zostavax on television and other places is as irresponsible as it is inappropriate. The value of the vaccine is overstated, while the risk of adverse reactions is downplayed.”

Whether someone should get the shingles vaccine is a matter of personal choice. This writer and American Free Press do not give medical advice. We do believe it is our obligation, though, to provide information for readers to research further and consult with their medical professionals.

James Spounias is the president of Carotec Inc., originally founded by renowned radio show host and alternative health expert Tom Valentine.

3 Comments on Maker of Shingles Vaccine Faces Lawsuits

  1. “You are not alone, and you do not have to be alone. When I was first diagnosed with HSV-2, one of my greatest fears was that I would never feel romantically or sexually connected to anyone ever again. Those fears have proven to be unfounded; if anything, my dedication to taking care of myself physically, spiritually, and mentally since my diagnosis was what led me to my cure.

    I started going to see different doctors and searching online to get more information, and then I saw an online testimony of how a lady was cured of HSV-2 by a herbal doctor named (Vikraft Sambo).

    At first I doubted because my doctor once told me that there is no cure, and also I have been scammed online and lost approximately $1900 USD in the process of contacting fake doctors online.

    After much deliberation, I decided to take a leap of faith because my health is more important than money. So I contacted Dr. Vikraft Sambo, and I was surprised when he didn’t ask me for any UPFRONT FEE.

    All he did was to send the herbal medicine through the courier service to me in Ireland. And then he gave me few guidelines/prescription on how I am to be taking the medicine.

    After 15-17 Days of drinking the medicine, I then went for a medical check up, and my doctor was amazed to see my test result showing NEGATIVE.

    I then contacted Dr. Vikraft Sambo and ask him why he didn’t publish his medicine, and he said, “there are lots of wicked people out there that makes money from the widespread of HSV and other deadly disease, they will do everything possible to hide any proven cure and I might end up getting killed”.

    So if you value your health more than wealth, and you are willing to get cured completely, kindly contact Dr. Vikraft Sambo with the below Link;

    Email: [email protected].

    Call or WhatsApp: +1 518 660 6915.

    https://vikraftsambo.wixsite.com/vikraftsamboherbs

    Some people might be thinking, ” why am I posting this testimony”? Well it’s a simple answer, I am healthy today because of someone else’s testimony, so why can’t I do the same for others.

  2. I wondered about this before because I don’t see how they could have a vaccine for shingles. I see the ads trying to con people into it all the time in the drugstores and on TV which I think is absolutely unethical. I don’t get any vaccinations anymore and I regret having my child vaccinated. Thankfully it was back in the 70’s when there were relatively few of them so there might not have been so much damage done. I got the polio vaccine myself at the time when it had the monkey virus in it and they knew that people would develop cancer from it. Read “Dr Mary’s Monkey” for more info on this one.

  3. I want to be kept up to date with this. I had a horrible reaction to the vaccine and since I have had shingles 3..yes 3 times!

Comments are closed.

css.php