AFP RADIO: “In the Spotlight” with Keith Johnson


“In the Spotlight”


8 – 10 p.m. ET —

AMERICAN FREE PRESS reporter Keith Johnson and his special guests share their unique perspectives on the most relevant world events in this informative live radio broadcast.

On this premiere edition of “In the Spotlight,” Keith continues to argue against those who believe that Sandy Hook was an elaborate hoax. Calls are invited in the second hour.

Sandy Hook researcher CW Wade joins the program to discuss his April 7 AFP debate with school safety expert Wolfgang W. Halbig.

Keith Johnson in an investigative journalist and creator of the Revolt of the Plebs.


Keith Johnson in an investigative journalist and creator of the Revolt of the Plebs.

5 Responses to AFP RADIO: “In the Spotlight” with Keith Johnson

  1. Jay weidner says:
    Halbig took you down Johnson. All you did was attack or divert. Learned a lot from you on how NOT to debate. You are pathetic.
  2. Bill Schultz says:
    Keith Johnson,

    If you want to report on the Sandy Hook Hoax, then go out and get the answers to all the inconsistencies and unanswered questions.

    1. Get all the State issued Death certificates for the victim and have them inspected to prove they aren’t forgeries.
    2. Get the crime scene photos that prove the story happened as stated.
    3. Get proof of Adam Lanza’s existence. (Anyone can be created on Photoshop and given a fake name.)
    4. Get the footage of the 400+ people rushing out of the school.
    5. Find out out who pronounced the pretend victims dead.
    6. Find out who cleaned up the hazardous waste, if there really was any, at the crime scene.
    7. Find out who delivered the porta-potties and what time they were delivered.
    8. Ask the police why they didn’t keep the only access road opened and cleared for the emergency personnel to get in and out of the crime scene.
    9. Ask why there was no computer activity at Sandy Hook since 2008.
    10. Ask why there were no holiday children’s decorations on the School windows, and instead massive amount of junk was plied up along the windows.
    11. Ask why all the ambulances were sitting at the firehouse instead of the school.
    12. Find out if the parents are really who they claim to be. (There is massive Photoshop fakery in the phony Parker family photos.) Ask why this was done.
    13. Ask the Parents who went on television why they were smiling and laughing.
    14. Ask the three police officers who were interviewed about the Sandy Hook shooting myth why they were at the Boston Bombing Hoax dressed in Craft International uniforms.
    15. Ask the F.B.I. why their 2012 crime report shows 0 murders in Newtown.


    A real reporter would.

    The only thing you seem to good at is being annoying, talking fast, name calling, speculating, and making accusations.

    We were sold a story with no proof what so ever that a crime was really committed.
    You cannot be very bright if you bought that crap.
    I suppose you bought the one about Usama bin Laden as well.

    You call yourself a truth seeker, well come on Mr. “truth seeker,” get to it.

    You like the Sandy Hook Story, as it was sold, so start proving it happened.

    If you can’t get these answers, then go away and shut the f*ck up!

  3. William McKinley says:
    Whether Sandy Hook went down the way the mainstream media says it did is quite debatable since there are plenty of inconsistencies to go around, my comments are aside from that.

    What amazes me is how anyone considers you (if they do) a credible journalist or reporter. I recently heard an archived interview you did and I was amazed at your style. So I went back and listened to as many archived reports/interview/debates that I could find and I have come to one conclusion, you do not seem to have the personality to be a credible reporter on any subject since your ability to be objective seems to be non-existent.

    You have not come to the realization, and at this juncture I doubt you will, that your reporting style makes the substance of your production whether it be a interview, article, or whatever, irrelevant. In other words, whether you have the facts on your side or not, your style, overshadows and renders it worthless.

    It’s time to find an new career!

  4. Brian wells says:
    This is for Keith.

    Dude, I listened to you on Infowars. You were combative, evasive, and a bully. You are the reason why Infowars exists. They’re was so much disinfo about Sandy Hook. I watched the whole debacle. Things like the school, the nurse, the shooter and his mom, who was a kindergarten teacher there. Guess what? She wasn’t. Etc. Etc. I don’t need to go on. It is all the inconsistencies that lead thousands to believe other than what the mainstream propaganda machine wants us to believe.

    Wake up dude.

    What a fu**ing douchebag you are, pal. You need to go back to shill school and get better instruction. Absolutely farcical defending the government version of this STERLING chicanery of Sandy Hook.

Leave a Comment

Required fields are marked with an *. Your email address will not be published. In order to ensure your comment is not lost due to an incorrect CAPTCHA entry, you may want to copy your comment before you click POST COMMENT. All comments containing hyperlinks will be held in moderation until they are formatted properly, but will be posted.

3 − one =

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>