• Israeli hegemony, rejection of diplomatic efforts are core planks of her policies.
By Ronald L. Ray —
Hillary Rodham Clinton, the unreformed socialist extremist, is also—oddly enough—the Trotskyite neoconservatives’ dream candidate for president of the United States. Despite Republican candidate Donald J. Trump’s immense popularity, it is advisable, in light of America’s recent history of rigged elections, to take a closer look at Queen Clinton’s dangerous foreign policy views, particularly as they relate to the grave situation of Syria, the Islamic State (ISIS) terrorists, and the entire Middle East region.
The Clinton campaign did not respond to any of the questions AMERICAN FREE PRESS submitted to Hillary, but we were able nevertheless to dig up the truth about her warmongering ways and the deadly threat they pose to the world. Just the few things Mrs. Clinton admits on her campaign website should scare off anyone with common sense. While her slogans sound nice, the details are disturbing.
Most alarming is Mrs. Clinton’s confrontational stance against nuclear-armed Russia and China. She calls China’s actions in the Pacific “aggressive” and claims she will “confine, contain, and deter Russian aggressions in Europe and beyond,” hardly the words of a diplomat attempting to engender international cooperation. And with both countries key allies of Syria and Iran, Mrs. Clinton’s belligerent stance could easily provoke the mutually assured nuclear destruction the neocons crave.
The Democratic candidate claims she wants to “defeat” ISIS and terrorism generally, along with “the ideologies that drive it,” but “without miring our troops in another misguided ground war.” Because no war is won without ground troops, that means the necessity of using proxies and mercenaries, so nothing will change, but war profits will soar.
Additionally, “never allowing Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon,” which that country is not seeking in any event, means an ongoing search for an excuse to bomb the Persians back into the Stone Age.
Hillary further claims that the “special alliance” with Israel is one of “the essential partnerships that are a unique source of America’s strength.” This is demented. But it is also the cornerstone of Mrs. Clinton’s foreign policy: All for Israel; Israel ueber alles.
In a Clinton email released by WikiLeaks, apparently written in 2012, Hillary’s entire rationale is laid bare for trying to topple Syrian President Bashar al-Assad—who is incredibly popular with his own people—while bringing untold misery to millions of innocent Syrians. It is, again, all for Israel, to achieve Israel’s imperialistic “security” goals. “What Israeli military leaders really worry about—but cannot talk about—is losing their nuclear monopoly,” wrote Mrs. Clinton.
So in order to maintain Israel’s rogue nuclear status, in violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty which the U.S. ratified, Mrs. Clinton continues, to promote a bloody coup in Syria using terrorist thugs—and not because Syria poses a direct threat to either the U.S. or Israel.
Rather, Mrs. Clinton writes: “It is the strategic relationship between Iran and the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria that makes it possible for Iran to undermine Israel’s security—not through a direct attack, which in the 30 years of hostility between Iran and Israel has never occurred, but through its proxies in Lebanon, like Hezbollah, that are sustained, armed, and trained by Iran via Syria . . . . The end of the Assad regime would end this dangerous alliance.”
Hillary the armchair Armageddonist thus admits that Iran is similarly no real threat. But in order to make regional “peace” on Israeli terms, Mrs. Clinton would wage ongoing war, even though it could easily provoke a catastrophic world war with Russia, China, and Iran.
What allies does the U.S. have in such a Mideast situation? A handful of nations we literally destroyed and the sociopathic, genocidal Zionists occupying Palestine. Oh, yes—and the Saudis and Qataris.
Given the Clintonista-controlled platform committee’s actions in preparation for the Democratic National Convention, and the broadside published by 51 war hawks at the formerly Clinton-run State Department calling for a direct hot war with Syria—not to mention the Clinton campaign’s own propaganda—it is clear that Hillary is a sycophantic, hardline Zionist extremist entirely in thrall to demands of a tiny but shrill Jewish minority.
She is committed totally to further illegal, immoral expenditure of American blood and treasure in proxy wars for Israel, despite the consequent high likelihood of war with Russia, China, and Iran, who are committed to the defense of the democratically elected, sovereign government in Syria.
In remarks at the November 30, 2012 Saban Forum, Mrs. Clinton stated, “America and Israel are in it together. . . . What threatens Israel threatens America, and what strengthens Israel strengthens us.” This bizarre identification of U.S. interests with those of the racist, terrorist, genocidal, rogue nuclear Zionists occupying Palestine is criminal—and psychotic.
Rather than diplomatic solutions to problems, a Clinton presidency would guarantee that America—Israel’s vassal—expands its evil, imperialistic wars against peaceful, sovereign nations, creating more hatred for our country and the distinct probability that nuclear bombs and missiles will detonate over millions of U.S. homes.
There’s a Lot More in the Clintons’ Closet
• She may have gotten away with the emails, but author says there is much worse lurking
By Victor Thorn
In fair and honest political and judicial systems, Hillary Clinton would be sitting behind bars right now. But after escaping another scandal—this one involving the use of multiple private email servers to handle official secret communications during her tenure as secretary of state, Hillary may instead be occupying the White House next January.
In reaction to the July 5 announcement by Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James B. Comey Jr. that the FBI would not recommend formal charges be brought against Mrs. Clinton, AMERICAN FREE PRESS interviewed Dr. Adrian Krieg, author of over a dozen published books on culture and politics.
Only hours after it became clear that the fix was in for Mrs. Clinton, Krieg stated: “The United States has become a third-world banana republic. The ruling on Hillary is unbelievable. The fact that she’s guilty cannot be denied. This country is no longer a representative republic. With the advent of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, it’s completely over the top.”
Krieg had more to say on this matter.
“A Hillary presidency on top of the most catastrophic administration in this nation’s history would bring America to a state where recovery would no longer be a viable option,” he said. “After eight years of Obama, and at least four more under Hillary, there would be no more America left. People should really think about what the outcome would be after 12 years of this fiasco.”
Softcover, 118 pages
Krieg continued: “Hillary has already promised that, if elected, she’d perpetuate Obama’s last eight years. If another progressive is successful in reaching the White House, it’ll be impossible to bring America back. Hillary will change things so drastically that she’ll attempt to eliminate the NRA and Second Amendment. She’ll also implement a national single-payer socialized healthcare system, while perpetuating Obama’s policies of putting coal miners out of business. Obama and Hillary both seek a socialist country.”
A look back at past policies gives some insight into what America’s future would look like under Hillary.
“Bill Clinton started all the NAFTA [North American Free Trade Agreement] free-trade nonsense that destroyed our workforce, and now Hillary wants to put him in charge of the economy,” she said. “Since NAFTA, America has lost 54,000 manufacturing companies, along with 11.7 million manufacturing jobs.”
Worse, Krieg outlined how a Hillary presidency would plunge us even deeper into illegality.
“Politics is a crooked game, but the Clintons have reached hallmark levels in serious criminality, including murder and intimidation,” he said. “Mainstream media investigators need to look more seriously at all the drugs that were flown into Mena airport in Arkansas. These were CIA [Central Intelligence Agency] operations, and Bill and Hillary were certainly involved.”
And that is not all when it comes to the Clintons’ criminal activity.
“If we look to the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), it makes Hillary’s email problems look minor league,” he said. “CGI is the biggest money laundering scheme ever developed. As secretary of state, she visited countries like China, Canada, Russia, and Saudi Arabia. Shortly thereafter, her husband gave speeches in these same places for $250,000 to $500,000.”
Overall, Krieg spelled out the inherent dangers of this situation: “The Clintons engaged in influence peddling, with so-called contributions going to CGI. We can’t even begin to guess how many favors they still owe to these countries and their leaders. If elected, CGI will become the world’s richest foundation. Bill and Hillary only care about one thing, and that’s obtaining more power.”
Victor Thorn is a hard-hitting researcher, journalist and author of over 50 books.
Not Even a Slap for Hillary Clinton
• Take a look at what happened to these men for “mishandling” secret docs
By Shane Smith
In the unlikely event we needed a reminder that the political class is above the law, Americans got it in bold, flashing letters when Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James B. Comey Jr. announced on July 5 that he would not recommend charges against Hillary Clinton for her criminally reckless mishandling of classified information.
It should really come as no surprise that Hillary walked, despite the severity of the charges. She’s a beloved scion of our vaunted political class. A jet-setting, warmongering, heir apparent to the U.S. war machine, she can’t be bothered with a handful of charges that she believes don’t apply to her. But while Hillary gets off scot-free even after all the evidence is piled up against her, others are not so lucky.
For example, Obama’s war on whistleblowers, who have been sent to prison for mishandling classified information, has been well documented. Despite his claim that his administration has been the most transparent in history, more whistleblowers have been prosecuted by Obama than at any other time in history.
According to fact-checking watchdog organization PolitiFact.com, Obama has used the Espionage Act more than all previous administrations combined.
By the time Edward Snowden was charged for his massive leak of classified information, the Espionage Act had been used by the Obama administration against a government worker six times already. That number has now risen to eight. To put it in perspective, the Espionage Act has been used 12 times total, ever, going all the way back to 1945.
It makes one wonder just who Obama believes these whistleblowers are spying for. Does he consider the American people an enemy nation? And what of the other seven charged with the 100-year-old act?
Here is a brief look at the whistleblowers prosecuted under the Espionage Act by Obama.
Thomas Drake, a former senior National Security gency (NSA) official, was indicted in 2010 for retaining classified information about the NSA’s warrantless wiretapping. The FBI believed Drake to have been the source for a New York Times story that revealed to the public the existence of such a program. In exchange for a guilty plea to the lesser charge of “mishandling government information,” the 10 felony counts against him were dropped.
John Kiriakou blew the whistle on the extent of torture that the U.S. employed overseas. Kiriakou also leaked the name of an undercover CIA officer, and for that, he received 30 months in prison. A letter signed by multiple members of the intelligence community urged President Obama to commute Kiriakou’s sentence, but the plea was denied.
James Hitselberger, a former Navy linguist contractor, was charged under the Espionage Act after it was found he retained classified information and sent some of it to Stanford University’s archives. Though it has not been revealed why he did this, Hitselberger ultimately pleaded guilty to several minor charges and the espionage charge was dropped.
Jeffrey Sterling, a former CIA employee, was the alleged source for New York Times reporter James Risen, who wrote extensively about Iran’s nuclear program and the deal Western powers were making with the Persian country. Sterling faces six charges under the Espionage Act, which could lead to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000.
Bradley Manning was prosecuted under the Espionage Act for the largest leak in U.S. history prior to Snowden’s massive data dump. Manning was sentenced to 35 years in prison following his conviction, and later said he leaked the information because he loves his country and wanted to counter lies being spread about U.S. operations in Iraq.
STEPHEN JIN-WOO KIM
Kim, a former State Department contractor, was charged with disclosing national defense information to Fox News reporter James Rosen. He pled guilty in 2014 and received a 13-month prison term.
Shamai Leibowitz, a former FBI Hebrew-English translator, was charged with disclosing classified FBI documents to online writer Richard Silverstein. The documents related to FBI wiretaps of the Israeli Embassy and exposed how Israel exploits its power and influence to manipulate Congress. He received a 20-month prison sentence.
Edward Snowden, a former CIA employee and contractor, leaked more classified information than any previous whistleblower in U.S. history. The political establishment is still reeling from the avalanche of revelations that his leak laid bare. Thanks to Snowden, a real debate was ignited over the methods of the Surveillance State. He is charged with two counts of violating the Espionage Act, as well as theft of government property.
An honorable mention of others who have mishandled classified information in the same manner as Hillary should be made as well. This includes naval reservist Bryan Nishimura, who, in 2012, admitted to mishandling classified information. He had downloaded classified information onto his personal devices while on base in Afghanistan and carried them to the United States. Like Hillary, he was found innocent of “criminal intent,” yet he was sentenced to two years of probation, a $7,500 fine, and the forfeiture of his personal computers that contained the classified data.
The lesson of Obama’s unprecedented prosecution of whistleblowers, combined with the not-even-a-wrist-slap for Hillary, is a stark reminder that there are two classes operating in American society: the elites and the peons. Understanding the difference between a Hillary and a Nishimura, who committed the exact same crime, is understanding just how wide a gulf exists between the elites and the rest of us.
Shane Smith is a freelance writer with an economics background, who lives in Norman, Oklahoma. This article originally appeared on the website Red Dirt Report.