Sandy Hook Parents Could Be in Danger

22_Sandy_Hook_new

By Keith Johnson —

There’s seemingly no limit to how far some will go to enforce on others their warped interpretation of what happened at the Sandy Hook Elementary School on December 14, 2012.

Less than a week before Mother’s Day, on May 5, a sign honoring seven-year-old Sandy Hook victim Grace McDonnell was stolen from a playground in Mystic, Connecticut. According to the local NBC affiliate, a man claiming to be the thief called the deceased child’s mother to say that her daughter “never existed” and then informed her that he stole the sign because he believed the “shooting was a hoax.”

This should come as no surprise to anyone who has followed the ongoing witch-hunt against the surviving Sandy Hook family members. In recent days, these already traumatized victims have increasingly become the targets of harassment and defamation by those who accuse them of being paid actors in a staged event orchestrated by the government as a pretext to gun confiscation.

Robbie Parker, whose daughter Emilie was one of the 20 first-graders killed by lone gunman Adam Lanza, is no stranger to this kind of abuse. A day after the tragedy, Parker was labeled a “crisis actor” and accused of “getting into character” as he nervously stepped before CNN cameras and proceeded to express grief over the loss of his child.

Parker has now become the focus of a fresh new series of attacks, this time coming from University of Minnesota Duluth’s Professor James Fetzer. In a May 14 article for the website “Veterans Today,” Fetzer declared: “We got him! Robbie Parker, crisis actor, at long last exposed!”

According to Fetzer’s article, Parker’s real name is Samuel Travis Delaney, an actor and musician from Texas who “uses multiple aliases” and was paid by the government to “manipulate gullible Americans.”

As proof that Delaney and Parker were one and the same, Fetzer provides a few photographs of the two men for a side-by-side comparison along with an unsubstantiated claim that they’d “uncovered” Parker’s “audition tape for Sandy Hook,” the same tactic used to convince people that dead children sang at the Super Bowl.

Donate to us

It didn’t take long for this story to completely unravel. Though Fetzer was absolutely convinced that he’d unmasked “the real Robbie Parker,” he was forced to make a full retraction two days later after the man—whose real name is John Matthew Walker—came forward and set the record straight.

“I am a penniless actor and musician from Austin, TX,” Walker wrote to Fetzer. “Last year, some internet wackos decided, through a convoluted process of ‘Facebook Connect-the-dots’, that I am in actuality Robbie Parker, parent of one of the Sandy Hook victims. Not only do I look little like him, at BEST I could pass for a relative, I am nearly a foot taller [figuratively, not literally] and COVERED in tattoos.”

In a follow up article, Fetzer—apparently fearing “the potential damages” of a lawsuit—admitted he was dead wrong. “John Matthew Walker did not play the role of ‘Robbie Parker’ at Sandy Hook,” he wrote. “We have revised our conclusion on the basis of the scientific requirement of total evidence, where another alternative is better supported given the totality of the available evidence.”

Though a mistake of this magnitude might compel some to think twice before making another outlandish claim, Fetzer wasted no time coming up with an alternative theory courtesy of a fellow Sandy Hook skeptic, who calls himself “Dr. Eowyn,” of the website Fellowship of the Minds.

In his supplemental article, Dr. Eowyn scrutinizes the photo of a brand-new “look-alike” suspect and opines: “Unless Robbie Parker of Sandy Hook has an identical twin (which no media account ever claimed and who, strangely, did not attend the memorial service for his niece), he is the same Robby Parker who’s a ‘quality assurance engineer’ at SpotterRF, a defense contractor that’s linked to Homeland Security and the CIA.”

This AMERICAN FREE PRESS reporter contacted Robby Parker at SpotterRF on May 19. When asked if he was aware of the allegation on the website “Veterans Today,” Parker laughed and said: “I saw that. That’s a different Robby Parker.” He declined to answer any further questions.

It cannot be denied that the lives of the surviving Sandy Hook family members have been put in jeopardy as a result of the libelous accusations and speculative claims made against them. Today, it’s a stolen sign and a malicious phone call. What about tomorrow?

Even Professor James F. Tracy—a devoted Sandy Hook conspiracy theorist—recently expressed his concern about potential violence after being approached by parties who “suggested that vigilante justice be visited upon the alleged Sandy Hook perpetrators.”

Is it just a matter of time before a parent, child or first responder connected to the Sandy Hook tragedy is physically assaulted by an unhinged Sandy Hook conspiracy theorist whose violent act was entirely motivated by hearsay?

Maybe there are some who are deliberately moving gullible people in that direction. Perhaps that’s the hoax we should really be worried about.

Keith Johnson is a writer based in Tennessee. He can be contacted at keithj.americanfreepress@yahoo.com

12 Responses to Sandy Hook Parents Could Be in Danger

  1. michaelB says:

    Wow, what happened to this paper? I was a subscriber a couple of years ago, and just popped in to see what was happening here. Man, I can read crap like this story on any of the main stream media papers! Very disappointing.

  2. Remi says:

    This is a very well done shill article.

  3. Daniel Morgan says:
    There are two ways to make an argument:

    1. provide evidence, as well as sources, while challenging your own conclusions first, present an overall opinion, AS AN OPINION, and offer your audience the sources to examine for themselves, encouraging them to draw their own conclusions. (very solid, convincing, and based on scientific method)

    2. Do what you did. Make unsupported statements, cherry-pick evidence, and demonize anyone who disagrees because they dare to question what they are told. (also known as yellow journalism.)

    Who would you believe; the first one, or the one who always responds with “…because I said so!”?

    One more point:

    If I am a ‘truther’ for seeking to propagate truth, and we are diametrically opposed because of it, does that make you a “Liar,” propagating lies? Just sayin’….

  4. Torch says:

    Debbie Williams, truth and proof are a two way street! Show us the proof that they are all dead! You’ve been lied to.

  5. Gaza says:

    If Sandy Hook blows up in their face, no telling what else will fall, and then making a living as fake opposition won’t pay so well.

  6. Gaza says:

    LOL, hey Keith, is it worth it, shilling for Israel? We noticed the coordinated effort to demonize truthers about Sandy Hook evolving: “The Ugly Truth,” AFP, Deanna Spingola and Rodney Martin among others. You’re co-opted opposition, all of yous, distorting the truth for our enslavers. Shame on yous.

  7. Pat says:

    As a former subscriber, this article confirms that I made a good decision stopping my subscription. Shame on you a**holes.

  8. Dylan says:
    I will just touch upon the Robbie Parker point.

    What Keith Johnson left out was that “Robbie Parker” was filmed laughing with a massive smile on his face before giving a press conference just 24 hours after his supposed daughter died.

    It was obviously a load of sh*t. Either Robbie Parker has no feeling or love for his dead daughter, or he is not the father of a dead daughter.

  9. Gofugurself says:

    Sandy Hook WAS a hoax. Wake up. It was a drill. Open your eyes. There is more than enough proof.

  10. Debbie Williams says:
    tusense96761:

    As a general rule, death certificates, just like birth certificates, in every state are not released to just anyone. It has been that way for a long time.

    What a sick and twisted mindset that intrudes into the lives of the families who lost loved ones that day. Funny how you still have the liberty to spread your unfounded rumors and lies without repercussion. You have no proof of anything that you say but yet you attempt to inspire others to believe you?

  11. bahmi says:

    Keith Johnson is a bonafide, certified shill and idiot.

  12. tusense96761 says:
    The author of this article hasn’t done their research.

    First of all there are no death certificates issues on any of those 20 children and they created a new law in Conn. that was once public information is not any longer when it comes to these supposed death certificates. What are they hiding that they have to create a new law?

    The school that supposedly this horrific mass murder of children happened had been closed down for years.

    No blood or no child was ever seen on a stretcher or moved into an ambulance or brought to a hospital. That is rather unusual. Might it be that the public would have too much access to the non-dead children if they were sent to a hospital?

    No tears were shed from the parents who appeared on camera; only happy faces of how great their children were.

    And the biggest tell-all of this disgusting deception on the American people and the world, which will go down in history with our fraud, liar impostor president Obama, and that is the memorial sites for these children were put up days before the shooting occurred.

    The American people are not stupid and we are not falling for these terror-induced incidents of government doing to cause a reaction that goes after our liberties.

    9-11 was a botched job because it wasn’t well planned, building 7 is the big give away, then Shanksville, Penn. where a planed crashed with 200 people, but yet the bodies, luggage or parts of the plane were non-existent at the crash site and the Pentagon was quite obvious that a plane didn’t make that hole in the building; it wasn’t large enough and the plane wings were never found. We can’t forget that within an instant of the plane crashing into the Towers they marched the government liar out to the media to say terror, terror, Bin Ladin, Bin Ladin. Bin Ladin was blamed but yet he never took credit for it. Why would he do it without taking credit; usually a terrorist wants something in return.

    I used to be a proud American, but I am ashamed and embarrassed of our government and feel betrayed by them and worse I feel they are evil and all of them need to be given a death sentence for these treasonous acts they have been involved in.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


× seven = 21

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>