Obama’s High Court Pick Would Dismantle Second Amendment

President Barack Hussein Obama wasted no time choosing a nominee for the Supreme Court who would almost guarantee a liberal majority on the high court.

Merrick “Garland has a long record, and, among other things, it leads to the conclusion that he would vote to reverse one of Justice Scalia’s most important opinions, D.C. vs. Heller, which affirmed that the Second Amendment confers an individual right to keep and bear arms,” writes Carrie Severino for the National Review.




 
 

Donate to us



 

5 Comments on Obama’s High Court Pick Would Dismantle Second Amendment

  1. Yes, another Jew. And the funniest thing was to see the Republicans, who were circling the wagons and vowing to shoot down any pick Obama came up with, then start to break ranks and announce support for Garland. If this doesn’t prove beyond any doubt that the Jews control BOTH parties, I don’t know what can. They own the FED, the Supreme Court, all candidates for President, and both houses. Who still remembers the 31 standing ovations for Netanyahu? No U.S. President in history ever even came close to getting that. We have indeed been conquered.
  2. The only way the Synagogue of Satan can gain full control over a country is to disarm the populace. People if you have learned anything through the study of history is to realize this truth. If you are not a student of history, it’s high time that you become one before it’s too late.
  3. DON’T WE HAVE ENOUGH JEWS ON THE COURT? WE MUST HAVE FORGOTTEN THAT THIS IS A CHRISTIAN NATION FOUNDED BY CHRISTIANS AND FOR CHRISTIANS. WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO OUR BELOVED AMERICA?

    PROUD U.S. ARMY VET

  4. WHY, WHY, WHY DO ALL THE JEWS IN AMERICA WANTING TO DISARM US: BLOOMBERG, PELOSI, SCHUMER, OBAMA, ETC., ETC., ETC. BUY A GUN, JOIN THE NRA. OUR FOUNDING FATHERS SAID NO ONE SHALL BE DENIED THE RIGHT TO HAVE A GUN. GOD BLESS AND HELP US FROM THE CHILDREN OF THE DEVIL. JESUS TOLD THE JEWS: “YOU ARE OF YOUR FATHER THE DEVIL.” I DO BELIEVE IN JESUS!
  5. We live in an era where many of the disgruntled demand with indignation that our institutions, and often the largest private companies, have a personnel that reflects the percentages of the races and ethnicities of the general population.

    So it is significant that by Obama appointing Merrick Garland, Jews, who are only 2% of the population will be 55% of the Supreme Court. Presently 4 out of 9 are Jews: Ginsburg, Kagan, Breyer (Ashkenazi) and Sotomayor (Sephardic).

    Why should this be and aren’t we free to discuss how bizarre it is? If 5 out of the 9 were all say, Jamaican, wouldn’t people be taking note and asking what is going on?

Comments are closed.

css.php