Bobby Kennedy Has a Big Job Ahead of Him

1 Comment on Bobby Kennedy Has a Big Job Ahead of Him

1. Let’s take a look at the 1954 paper virologists point to for the existence of measles, and see what the paper’s authors admit In the Discussion section:

   “Although we have thus already obtained
   considerable indirect evidence supporting the
   etiologic role of this group of agents in measles,
   2 experiments essential in the establishment of
   this relationship remain to be carried out.
   These will consist in the production of measles
   in the monkey and in man with tissue culture
   materials after a number of passages in vitro
   sufficient to eliminate any virus introduced
   in the original inoculum. The recovery of the
   virus from the experimental disease in these
   hosts should then be accomplished.”

   https://archive.org/details/EndersPeebles1954

   “Indirect evidence” is the paper’s findings, and that standard of ‘science’ continues today,*
   because virology conspires to not conduct the two “essential” experiments that would confirm the existence of measles, and rule out stressed cells excreting what today are called exosomes.

   Firstly, when pressed under oath in court, medical science is compelled to admit there is no such thing as a virus. Secondly, medical science tells us there are no vaccines for cold viruses, the coronavirus, and RSV, being a cold virus.** Thirdly, if a blood vessel is pricked receiving a jab, where the needle wasn’t aspirated, that means, in the case of the COVID-19 “vaccines”, the nanoparticles carrying the mRNA have entered the bloodstream, and will now enter the cells of organs throughout the body,*** and being a foreign element within those cells, the immune system destroys the cells, leading to organ damage and/or subsequent death, the severity of the outcome depending on if the syringe carried a full mRNA load, or if its contents was merely saline.

   This is why in 2017 the CDC and WHO alerted the medical community there was no longer a need to aspirate a needle, preventing the contents of the syringe from entering a blood vessel…

   “Aspiration before injection of vaccines or toxoids (i.e., pulling back on the syringe plunger after needle insertion but before injection) is not necessary because no large blood vessels are present at the recommended injection sites, and a process that includes aspiration might be more painful for infants (22).”

   https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/general-recs/administration.html

   “…no large blood vessels”? The smallest blood vessels are measured in millionths of a meter (um), while nanoparticles that carry the mRNA are measured in billionths of a meter (nm). That’s called premeditated murder, identifying the Marxist co-option of our institutions.

   Let’s take a look at WHO…

   “Do NOT aspirate, i.e. do not pull back on the syringe after inserting in the injection site as it increases the pain:
   − There are no large blood vessels at the recommended injection sites or injection into a large vessel, so no risk of major bleeding.”

   https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/immunization/multiple-injections/trainingmodule_painmanagement_final.pdf?sfvrsn=1b91f223_7&ua=1

   ——————
   * “I have to expressly clarify that one cannot provide evidence in the classical sense in biology as one can in mathematics or physics. In biology one can only gather clues, which at some point in time in their entirety attain probative value.“ — Professor Andreas Podbielski, University of Rostock, 2015, giving expert testimony on the existence of viruses at Ravensburg Local Court.

   As Dr. Lanka observes:

   “Based on this extremely unscientific claim arising from Podbielski’s lack of arguments and his bias due to the discrepancies between reality and the beliefs he had grown so fond of, something happened which behavioural scientists call “displacement”. Podbielski invented a desperate excuse, namely that biology and the medicine based thereon as well as vaccinations are per se unscientific and without evidence, without proof: In his opinion, only a collection of clues could “some day” and “somehow” (practically) attain probative value. A more explicit admission of the existent unscientific nature of current biology and medicine has never been expressed with such clarity.”

   https://dokumen.pub/wissenschafftplus-magazin-the-virus-misconception-part-1-measles-as-an-example-i-01-2020nbsped.html

   Now, for the real shocker: How a virus is manufactured piecemeal, not captured whole…

   “1. The fact of Alignment

   Virologists have never isolated a complete
   genetic strand of a virus and displayed it directly,
   in its entire length. They always use very short
   pieces of nucleic acids, whose sequence consists
   of four molecules to determine them and call
   them sequences. From a multitude of millions of
   such specific, very short sequences, virologists
   mentally assemble a fictitious long genome
   strand with the help of complex computational
   and statistical methods. This process is called
   alignment.

   The result of this complex alignment, the
   fictitious and very long genetic strand, is
   presented by virologists as the core of a virus
   and they claim to have thus proven the
   existence of a virus. However, such a complete
   strand never appears in reality and in scientific
   literature as a whole, although the simplest
   standard techniques [Gel Electrophoresis]
   have long been available to
   determine the length and composition of nucleic
   acids simply and directly. By the fact of the
   alignment, instead of presenting a nucleic acid
   of the appropriate length directly, the virologists
   have disproved themselves.

   …

   3. Alignment is only done by means
   of mental constructs

   In order to be able to mentally/computationally
   assemble the very short sequences of the
   nucleic acids used into a long genome, the
   virologists need a template to align the short
   sequences into a very long, supposedly viral
   genome strand. Without such a given, very long
   sequence, it is not possible for a virologist to
   construct a viral genome
   theoretically/computationally. Virologists argue
   that the constructed genome is from a virus
   because the alignment was done with another,
   given viral genome.

   This argument of the virologists is briefly and
   unambiguously refuted by the fact that all
   templates with which new genetic material
   strands were generated
   theoretically/computationally were themselves
   and finally generated
   theoretically/computationally and do not
   originate from a virus.” – Dr. Stefan Lanka

   https://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/wissenschafftplus-virologists.pdf

   …and…

   ** “What’s Causing My Cold?

   …

   It’s likely that someday you’ll have a close encounter with one of these types:

   Rhinovirus

   Coronavirus

   RSV and parainfluenza”

   https://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/common_cold_causes

   What medical science says about vaccines for common cold viruses…

   “Why Is There No Vaccine for the Common Cold?

   ………..

   Research and Vaccine Development

   Research on the development of a common cold vaccine suggests that a vaccine for the common cold is not likely in the near future.

   A study that compiled past and present research on the development of a rhinovirus vaccine noted that:7

   It will be difficult to develop the vaccine because rhinovirus infects quickly and mutates, or changes, quickly.

   In clinical trials that tested a cold vaccine with just one strain, results showed that it was not protective.

   In clinical trials that focused on a cold vaccine with 10 strains, results also found it to be ineffective.

   If a cold vaccine does get developed, it will likely need to provide broad protection against many strains of rhinovirus.”

   https://www.verywellhealth.com/why-there-will-never-be-a-vaccine-for-the-common-cold-770451

   *** Instead of entering muscle cells in the deltoid region.