Will Washington Kill Us All?

• U.S. foreign policy has to fundamentally and totally change.

By Paul Craig Roberts —

Did you know that Washington keeps 450 nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) on “hair-trigger alert”? Washington thinks that this makes us “safe.” The reasoning, if it can be called reason, is that by being able to launch in a few minutes, no one will try to attack the United States with nuclear weapons. U.S. missiles are able to get on their way before the enemy’s missiles can reach the U.S. to destroy ours.

If this makes you feel safe, you need to read Eric Schlosser’s book, Command and Control.

The trouble with hair-triggers is that they make mistaken, accidental and unauthorized launch more likely. Schlosser provides a history of almost launches that would have brought Armageddon to the world.

In Catalyst, a publication of the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), Elliott Negin tells the story of Soviet Lieutenant Colonel Stanislav Yevgrafovich Petrov. Just after midnight in 1983 the Soviet Union’s early warning satellite system set off the alarm that five U.S. ICBMs were headed for the Soviet Union.

Petrov was supposed to inform the Soviet leader, who would have eight to 10minutes to decide whether to launch in retaliation. Who knows what he would have decided? Instead, Petrov used his judgment. There was no reason for the U.S. to be attacking the Soviet Union. Moreover, Petrov reasoned that an American attack would involve hundreds of ICBMs, possibly thousands. He checked whether Soviet ground-based radar had detected incoming ICBMs, and it had not. Petrov decided it was a false alarm and sat on it.

It turned out that the early warning system had mistaken a pattern of sunlight reflection on clouds as missiles. This was a close call, but Negin reports that “a failed computer chip and an improperly installed circuit card are some of the culprits” that could initiate nuclear war. In other words, the sources of false alarms are numerous.

Fast forward to today. Imagine an American officer monitoring the U.S. early warning system. This officer has been listening to 15 years of war propaganda accompanied by U.S. invasions and bombings of eight countries. Terrorist warnings and security alerts abound, as do calls from American and Israeli politicians for nuking Iran.




 
 
 

The media has convinced him that Russia has invaded Ukraine and is on the verge of invading the Baltics and Poland. American troops and tanks have been rushed to the Russian border. There is talk of arming Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putin is dangerous and is threatening nuclear war, running his strategic bombers close to our borders and holding nuclear drills. The American officer has just heard a Fox News general again call for “killing Russians.” The Republicans have convinced him that Obama is selling out America to Iran, with Senator Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) warning of nuclear war as a consequence. We will all be killed because there is a “Muslim in the White House.”

Why isn’t anyone standing up for America, the patriotic American officer wonders, just as the alarm goes off: Incoming ICBMs. Are they Russian or Iranian? Was Israel right after all? A hidden Iranian nuclear weapons program? Or has Putin decided that the U.S. is in the way of his reconstruction of the Soviet empire, which the American media affirms is Putin’s goal? There is no room for judgment in the American officer’s mind. It has been set on hair-trigger by the incessant propaganda that Americans call news. He passes on the warning.

Obama’s Russophobic neocon national security advisor is screaming: “You can’t let Putin get away with this!”

“It might be a false alarm,” replies the nervous and agitated president.

“You liberals! Don’t you know that Putin is dangerous? Push the button!”

And there goes the world.

Considering the extreme Russophobia being created among Americans by the Ministry of Propaganda, the demonization of Putin—the “new Hitler,” Vlad the Impaler—the propagandistic creation of “the Russian threat,” the crazed neocon desire for U.S. world hegemony, the hatred of Russia and China as rising rivals capable of exercising independent power, the loss of American uni-power status and unconstrained unilateral action. In the midst of these emotions and minds swayed not by facts but by propaganda, hubris and ideology, there is a great chance that Washington’s response to a false alarm will bring the end of life on Earth.

How much confidence do you have in Washington? How many times has Washington—especially the crazed neocons—been wrong?

Remember the three-week “cakewalk” Iraq War that would cost $70 billion and be paid out of Iraqi oil revenues? Now the cost is $3,000 billion and rising, and after 12 years the radical Islamic State controls half of the country. To pay for the wars, the Republicans want to “privatize,” that is, take away, Social Security and Medicare.

Remember “Mission Accomplished” in Afghanistan? Twelve years later the Taliban again control the country and D.C., after bombing women, children, funerals, weddings, village elders and kids’ soccer games, has been driven out by a few thousand lightly armed Taliban members.

The frustrations of these defeats have mounted in Washington and in the military. The myth is that we lost because we didn’t use our full force. We were intimidated by world opinion or by those damn student protesters, or blocked from victory by some gutless president, a liberal who wouldn’t use all of our power. For the neocons, rage is a way of life.




The neocons believe fervently that history has chosen America to rule the world, and here we are defeated by Vietnamese guerrillas, by Afghan tribesmen, by Islamist fundamentalists and now Putin has sent his missiles to finish the job.

Whoever the White House fool is, he will push the button.

The situation is deteriorating, not improving.

The Russians, hoping for some sign of intelligence in Europe, contradict Washington’s anti-Russian lies. Washington calls truthful contradiction of its own propaganda to be Russian propaganda. Washington has ordered the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), a U.S. government agency headed by Andrew Lack, a former chairman of NBC news, to counteract an alleged, but non-existent, “Kremlin troll army” that is outshouting the Western prostitutes and “perpetuating a pro-Russian dialogue” on the Internet. [Lack quit the BBG last month to return to his old company as chairman of NBC News and MSNBC.—Ed.]

In case you don’t remember, Lack is the idiot who declared Russian news agency RT to be a “terrorist organization.” In other words, in Lack’s opinion, one that he can enforce, a truth-teller is a terrorist.

Lack epitomizes Washington’s view of truthful reporting: If it doesn’t serve Washington’s propaganda, it is not true. It is terrorism.

Lack hopes to control RT with intimidation: In effect, he has told RT to shut up and say what we want or we will close you down as a terrorist organization. We might even arrest your American employees as aiders and abettors of terrorism.

To counteract a revanchist Russia and its Internet troll army, the Obama regime is handing $15.4 million to the insane Lack to use to discredit every truthful statement that emerges from the English language versions of Russian media. This amount, of course, will rise dramatically. Soon it will be in the billions of dollars, while Americans are evicted from their homes and sent to prison for their debts.

In his budget request, Lack, who seems to lack every aspect of humanity, including intelligence, integrity and morality, justified his request, which will be granted, for the hard-earned money of Americans whose standard of living is falling, with the wild assertion that Russia “threatens Russia’s neighbors and, by extension, the United States and its Western allies.”

Lack promises to do even more: “The U.S. international media is now set . . . to refute Russian propaganda and influence the minds of Russians and Russian speakers in the former Soviet Union, Europe and around the world.” Lack is going to propagandize against Russia inside Russia.

Of course, the Central Intelligence Agency organizations—the National Endowment for Democracy and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty—will be enriched by this anti-Russian propaganda campaign and will support it wholeheartedly.

Therefore, the UCS’ call for cooperation with Russia to take ICBMs off hair-trigger status is unlikely to occur. How can nuclear tensions be reduced when Washington is building tensions as fast as it possibly can? Washington’s Ministry of Propaganda has reconstructed Putin as Osama bin Laden or Saddam Hussein—bogeymen who evoke fear from the brainwashed American sheeple. Russia is transformed into al Qaeda lusting for another attack on the World Trade Center and for the Red Army (many Americans think Russia is still communist) to roll across Europe.

But the UCS, of which I am a member, needs to come to its senses. It is impossible to work out a reduction in nuclear threat as long as one side is going all out to demonize the other. The demonization of Russia and its leader by The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, Fox News and the rest of the American Propaganda Ministry, by almost the entirety of the House and Senate and by the White House makes reducing the threat of nuclear war impossible.

The American people and the entire world need to understand that the threat to life on Earth resides in Washington and that, until Washington is fundamentally and totally changed, this threat will remain as the worst threat to life on Earth.

Donate to us

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was assistant secretary of the U.S. Treasury under President Ronald Reagan and was associate editor and columnist at The Wall Street Journal. He has been a professor of economics in six universities, and is the author of numerous books and scholarly contributions. He has testified before Congress on 30 occasions.

css.php