No Such Thing as Free Speech with “Holocaust Denial” Laws

• German lawyer Sylvia Stolz condemned to prison for telling the truth.

• Found guilty by “mind-reading” Bavarian judge.

By Ronald L. Ray —

Sylvia Stolz is an outspoken, 51-year-old lawyer in Germany. At the end of February 2015, she was condemned by Judge Martin Rieder of the Munich State Court to 20 months in prison for alleged denial of the so-called Jewish holocaust during World War II, and for “inciting racial hatred.” But there is just one problem with Stolz’s “guilt”: she never denied anything.




Judge Rieder, however, in true clairvoyant fashion, claimed to find the criminal act in what he said was the “meaning and purpose” of a talk Stolz gave in 2012 at a public conference in Switzerland, albeit the “denial” was “not at all so openly addressed.” Instead of judging words and actions, he presumed to judge an unspoken intent—the ultimate in thought-crime prosecution.

This supposedly horrific act occurred at an event sponsored by the Anti-Censorship Coalition [Anti-Zensur Koalition] and was one speech among many. Some 2,000 people were in attendance to hear Stolz talk about judicial censorship and gave her a standing ovation. It’s all on video for the world to see—with English subtitles, no less. Click here for the full video in German.

Frau Stolz, the wife of imprisoned Revisionist Horst Mahler, is no stranger to persecution. In 2007, Stolz defended Revisionist historian Ernst Zuendel in German court from similar charges of “holocaust denial.” But when she attempted to bring forth exculpatory evidence, namely, scientific and historiographic research which at least raised legitimate questions about the existence or extent of a Jewish genocide in WWII, the judge disallowed her efforts and banned her from the trial. To her credit and honor, the intrepid lawyer continued her vociferous defense of Zuendel as they carried her out of the courtroom.

Because “holocaust denial” is a criminal offense in Germany, no evidence is admitted in favor of a defendant which flies in the face of the “obvious facts” of purported genocide—even when that evidence is the truth. Lawyers who dare inject the truth into the proceedings, as Stolz did for Zuendel, are punished swiftly and severely. That is how Stolz landed in prison the first time, for more than four years, and was disbarred for five years.




 
 
 

So what happened in 2012 to get Stolz into hot water again with the Trotskyites at the Ministry of Truth? What did the woman say?

Frau Stolz spoke about censorship: the deliberate and systematic repression exercised by the German legal system against those who raise publicly any doubt or denial of the Zionist-created myth of “at least six million” Jews “gassed to death” by National Socialist Germany. She reported what happens to people, including defense lawyers, who bring forth the results of numerous scientific studies proving the impossibility of the “gas chamber” story; who point to numerous court verdicts over the last decades, from the Nuremberg war crimes trials onward, which declare the total lack of standard forensic evidence for a Jewish genocide; and who note that those same verdicts declare an almost total reliance on the contradictory testimony of unreliable witnesses, some of whom committed perjury.

That is to say, Stolz simply recounted to the audience what courts themselves and scholars had said about the so-called “holocaust,” which raises doubts about the official story, but about which it is forbidden by German law to speak, in contravention of the country’s constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech and opinion.

Stolz herself took no position on the alleged WWII events at the conference, but she pled for the right of free speech and, following in the footsteps of Western philosophers from Aristotle on, for the importance of seeking the good, the true and the beautiful.

However, a Swiss law professor was offended all the same and claimed she was “inciting race hatred.” “Holocaust denial” is not criminalized in Switzerland, though, and the “incitement” charge is difficult to prove in Swiss courts. It may be for this reason that the Swiss justice authorities asked a Bavarian court to try Stolz—despite the fact that Germany has no jurisdiction in independent Switzerland.

The powers that be demand at all cost that those who dare to speak the truth about WWII Germany be silenced and severely punished. The religious orthodoxy of “Holocaustianity” may not be questioned by the masses, for, if they did, the brutal global hegemony of Zionist warlords and banksters might then collapse.

Now, it seems, the “holocaust” story has become so much a political dogma, that even to talk about the doubts which courts themselves cast on the official narrative is too much truth for the authorities, who swiftly drag the offender to punishment without even a fair trial and presentation of evidence. In Stolz’s case, the Zionist-controlled world media and the Munich court itself deliberately misrepresented the facts to justify a condemnation.

This gross injustice against Mrs. Stolz must be rectified. Currently, she is still free on appeal. But while the German Constitutional Court, its highest court, has ruled that such freedom of expression is legal and constitutionally protected, the lower courts and prosecutors routinely ignore that judgment and make appeals too costly in terms of additional costs and punishment for the persecuted to take their case to the high court.

Mrs. Stolz’s defense attorney has issued a statement that, should appeal to the Federal Court fail, they are already considering an appeal to the Constitutional Court. They contest the jurisdiction of German courts over an event in Switzerland, object that there was no “holocaust denial,” and point out that the infamous §130 forbidding such “denial” is unconstitutional.

Readers are encouraged to contact the German authorities and politely but firmly demand freedom for Sylvia Stolz, using the website of the German embassy in the United States or by calling (202) 298-4000.

Donate to us

Ronald L. Ray is a freelance author and an assistant editor of THE BARNES REVIEW. He is a descendant of several patriots of the American War for Independence.

image_print

23 Responses to No Such Thing as Free Speech with “Holocaust Denial” Laws

  1. Ju Zeus says:
    What is six minus three? According to “the” holocaust, it’s 6. It seems to be a ‘holy number’ of sorts, a magical number able to transcend simple arithmetic, a 6 followed by 6 zeros. From 1990-1995, 2.5 million victims were erased from the Auschwitz memorial plates, but not from “the” holocaust.

    So, what’s the big deal about thr… *cough, I-mean-six million people anyway? How many were burned to death in carpet-bombing Deutsch cities and starved in the Eisenhower death-camps? Why are 1.5 million Armenians never spoken of, while “six” million Jews are fawned over every day?

    Were 66 million Russians murdered by bolshevik Jews?

    Before anyone goes off the rails and flings a certain insult/accusation, I’d like to remind you that there are 14 million Jews and 330 million Semites. Israel doesn’t seem particularly concerned with the Semites they are dropping white phosphorus on and wiping off the map. Very few people are particularly concerned with the the second most anti-Jewish act of all time: the rape-torture-mutilation of newborn Jewish boys.

    “Second most”… I’d say the #1 spot belongs to the Canaanite practice of burning their children to death as an offering to molech. Doctor: to falsify; etymology: church father. Today our church (the cult of Hermes) is still burning children to death in salt, or ripping them limb from limb.

  2. Martin Timothy says:
    The Holocaust was a Zionist plot to kill those Jews who remained true to the Divine Covenant, by which Allah assures Jews the Messiah will appear, who will restore the fortunes of the Jewish people and establish the state of Israel, it exhorts them to patience until then!

    Professor Dommergue’s research mirrors one’s own findings, garnered from a single interview with former WW2 RAF Bomber Pilot Moshe Dyan Kaplan, who claims to be a Pharisee who says his Amsterdam family emerged unscathed, and that the Jews of Amsterdam who were gassed were called “Cheesies,” as well he gave to understand that as far as he was concerned they were neither missed nor mourned.

    Witness the testimony of Katherine Schweitzer a Jewish lady from Budapest, who in the 1990s went public in an interview with Australian 60 Minutes reporter Richard Carleton, that her family of 14 was arrested in 1944 and deported to Auschwitz, by a Jew who was living a few doors up on the same street in Sydney. Her murdered body was discovered in a wheely bin inside her high security Sydney apartment building, December 28, 2006, four weeks we put her story worldwide.

    According to Alex Jones, George Soros then in his teen years “cataloged” the possessions of Jews deported from Budapest at that time, we say he was “hands on” in her case!

    Hitler was a Jew, the non-Jewish Nazis Ernst Rohm and the SA hierarchy whose Zionist financed wickedness and thuggery brought H to power, were liquidated in the Night of the Long Knives Massacres that began in June 1934, after Hitler was sworn in as German Chancellor January 31, 1933.

    Jews and traitor Americans perped the 911 attacks, not Osama bin Laden and 19 crazy Arabs. Abortion is genocide, terror bombings worldwide are the work of Zion and Israel.

    Jews infiltrated German politics then perped the Holocaust in the name of the German people, like they infiltrated U.S. politics perped 911 then established the bogus War on Terror, like they infiltrated Turkish politics then perpetrated the Armenian Genocide.

    The dearth of active response in the relevant countries is because their leaders are selected and sponsored to office by Jews and the Jew-owned media, who as Zionists are culpable to begin with.

  3. Pat Kittle says:
    The precious “Holocaust” story is full of lies and fraudsters.
    Example:

    “HOLOCAUST HOAX: HERMAN ROSENBLAT RESPONDS TO CONTROVERSY”

    Charming, isn’t he.

  4. Camille says:
    I once believed that freedom of speech existed. I was saddened to find out that these laws exist. What kind of a world are we going to have in the future if this keeps on existing? Hypocritical to say the least. Why shouldn’t anyone be able to express their opinion, it doesn’t hurt to talk freely and it may bring about understanding amongst us all. Until then the world will be a very sad and repressed place. I cannot stand anyone who does not let another express their opinion. I only hope that this world wakes up to itself one day.
  5. Dominic says:
    55 million people died in WWII. They should have a World Genocide Day, not Hollowcaust Day.

    The Holocaust industry is worth over $70 billion. Only Jews would capitalize on this and re-victimise themselves. Half the cases are thrown out as they have already claimed before, now they are going for descendents of forefathers that died and then there are the self-inflicted graffiti attacks!

    Trouble is they have been brought up to believe this sh*t more than anyone else.

    They should try reading The Transfer Agreement.

    Adolf and the Zionist movement creating Israel. They hate it. In case we find out.

  6. Chaim says:
    My uncle died at Auschwitz.

    He fell off a watchtower.

  7. Alphonso says:
    CODOH—Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust—is run by Bradley Smith, a U.S. veteran of the Korean War. Learn what the revisionists have to say in their own words at the CODOH forums. Don’t let freedom of speech die in the U.S. like it did in Europe.
  8. joggler says:
    If the holocaust happened or not the way it is taught is very easy to answer when you know the truth of the Bible.

    When you understand the prophecy of Daniel 9:23-27 correctly you see through the Jesuit/Vatican futurist lie (a result of the Council of Trent from 1545-1563) and that Jesus Christ fulfilled the 70th week completely.

    Now why is that important?

    Because the Vatican teaches a future ANTICHRIST and that the ‘he’ in Daniel 9:27 was NOT Jesus Christ.

    Therefore the Zionist movement had to be started to found a new state of Israel, get Jews to live in the land and start making animal sacrifices again (that is about to start when they build the temple in Jerusalem again—it’s all prepared today).

    When you understand Daniel’s 70-week prophecy, as all early Christians and the Protestant reformers did too, you will see the real reason (because there is no biblical one) for the founding of the modern state of Israel. The futurist interpretation of Antichrist, started by Alcazar and Ribeira in 1590) is a lie, a denial of the first coming of Jesus Christ as Messiah and the reason for the foundation of Israel in these ‘modern’ times so that the pope (the biblical, historical and prophetic Antichrist) can be received as another Christ.

    So when the Jews did not want to go to Palestine because they were not called by GOD to go, immigration had to be forced by all means.

    ‘The end justifies the means’ as you can read in the fourth Jesuit oath of induction.

    Study the Bible which is the true WORD of GOD and the truth does not fear investigation!

  9. Belair says:
    The death toll of the standard holocaust narrative is a physical impossibility. A letter from Jewish French Dr. Roger Dommergue to Steven Spielberg.
  10. Dngan says:
    First they came for the holocaust deniers, and I did not speak out-because I was not a holocaust denier.
    Then they came for the neo-Nazis, and I did not speak out-because I was not a neo-Nazi.
    Then they came for antisemitist, and I did not speak out-because I was not an antisemitist.
    Then they came for fundamentalist Christians, and I did not speak out-because I was not a fundamentalist Christian.
    Then they came for preachers against homosexuality, and I did not speak out-because I was not a preacher against homosexuality.
    Then they came for far-right activist, and I did not speak out-because I was not a far-right activist.
    Then they came for me-and there was no one left to speak for me.
  11. Dan says:
    I may not agree with what the holocaust deniers said. But I will surely defend their rights to express their opinions. The law that prohibits holocaust denial is totally absurd and totalitarian which restricts people’s freedom. Also, there are numerous genocides and massacres occur in history, should the denial of those genocides become illegal? You won’t be arrested for denying the 1989 Tiananmen Square genocide, you won’t be arrested for denying the Holodomor, you won’t be arrested by denying the Nanjing massacre, you won’t be arrested by denying the Armenian genocide, you won’t be arrested for denying the persecution of Falun Gong in China but you will be arrested by denying the HOLICAUST!! This is surely double standard and injustice!
  12. Charles Krafft says:
    Please send the address of the prison where Sylvia Stoltz is being held to: whodareswings@yahoo.com. People who are concerned about free speech and free historical inquiry should take a few minutes to send a postcard or letter of support to the Holocaust heretics currently serving sentences in European prisons. For about $1 in stamps you can make someone’s dreary day a little bit better.

    Wolfgang FRÖHLICH -JVA Stein – Steiner Landstr 4 – A-3504 Kreims-Stein / Wachau – NO – AUSTRIA

    Horst MAHLER – Anton Saefkow Allee 22 – D-14772 Brandenburg /Havel – GERMANY

    Axel Möller – JVA Bützow – Kühlungsborner Str. 29a – D-18246 Bützow – GERMANY

    Gerhard Ittner – JVA St. Georgen – Markgrafenallee 49 – D-95448 Bayreuth – GERMANY

    Vincent Reynouard- c/o Siegfried Verbeke-Italiëlei 203b- B-2000 Antwerp -BELGIUM

  13. S. Wesley Mcgranor says:
    Denial is foolish. We need to stop observing the pagan sacrifice religiously as Christians, and thus cease from atoning for a guilt not ours.
  14. Tom says:
    The Greatest Story Never Told, a six hour documentary that proves without a shadow of a doubt, the Zionist-led Allies were behind WW1 and WW2, and Germany was not about a madman wanting to conquer the world, but a nation defending itself from sociopathic bankers. Sort of what we are going through today.
  15. Greg Burton says:
    I think we should talk about the Holocaust.

    Not many know that the Holocaust was just another chapter in an ancient, inter-tribal feud between the occult elements of Judaism that formed the basis for NaZism and its Zionist counter-part in “Nazi” Germany: the impetus for the transfer agreements, Germany’s WWII part of the Rothschild plan for the creation of Israel out of the nation-state of Palestine; and the “refuseniks,” those Jews who opposed NaZism, Zionism, Jewish nationalism. Those Jews who found Zionism as an affront to Judaism, who thought rightly that it was/is a cult that contradicts the foundations of justice found in the Torah.

    Further, people need to understand the theosophical roots of Zionism/NaZism, Jewish nationalism, found even in Bolshevism, that they are the same: the Babylonian Talmud, the Kaballah, the occult, Egyptian Book of the Dead acting through the levels of initiation found in co-opted Freemasonry: e.g. the Thule Gesselschaft and Vril, the Golden Dawn, Skull and Bones, the Brotherhood of Death. That Satanism, Satanic Ritual Abuse-Project Monarch, eugenics, racism, depopulation, the “Holocaust” and related genocides of the modern era are their spawn. If people knew this history, the Rothschild banking clique, the Satanic oligarchy and its nuclear nation-state Israeli agent would be overthrown tomorrow.

    By continuing to howl that the Holocaust is a fraud, a hoax, how many died, etc…is only a deliberate distraction and does a disservice to history, the true multi-millennia history of the tension between the occult, Zionism and Judaism; and to those struggling to get free from Zionism, internationalism, the communo-fascist New World Order in Palestine and the world.

  16. hp says:
    Europeans have had their free speech and free will castrated by “the usual suspects.”

    Until the Europeans stand up as one and demand the right to say (whether they believe it or not), WE DON’T BELIEVE IT!!!!!!!!!, they will be nothing but neo-eunuchs. I won’t hold my breath.

    Zio-America, Jr. (Canada) is next and then Zio-USA.

    The writing is on the wall and you know which wall I’m talking about.

  17. bonele says:
    Docpo:

    Could you please elaborate on your assertions about German courts or perhaps provide a link to explain? I would be very interested.

  18. Its Me says:
    I’m always skeptical when people will not allow an opposing discussion on anything such as the holocaust. If the proof is so astoundingly apparent, then why do they show a bunch of problems with the situation? Perhaps what they’re saying is really true and government can’t stomach that they’ve been lied to at such a level as to make them so stupid for falling for it. On the other hand maybe it happened worse than they say it did. Either way, let people debate it to their heart’s content.
  19. AFP says:

    JP:

    That can’t be true, because your comment is posted.

  20. Docpo says:
    All courts of law in Germany are private companies and have no legal rights whatsoever. Paragraph 15 of the “Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz GVG” saying that courts of law are state operated was deleted in 1950, the whole law (GVG), where the legal system is based on, was deleted in 2007. So she was not sentenced by a judge but by an impostor. Unfortunately I have no means to let her know. Since I informed Dr. Hamer, who was sentenced several times by other “clairvoyants” and he informed them that he knows there were no more (il)legal actions against him.
  21. JP says:
    There’s no such thing as free speech on American Free Press. Keep firing all the pro-Whites, you hypocritical filth.
  22. Sanctified says:

    TRUTH

Leave a Comment

Required fields are marked with an *. Your email address will not be published. All comments containing hyperlinks will be held in moderation until they are formatted properly, but will be posted. All comments containing obscenities will be amended and posted, unless they are too obscene and nonsensical, in which case they will be deleted.