American Free Press AFP
Last Real Newspaper
Top_bar7About AFPBookstoreArchivesMember Login
left_menu8E-NewsletterContact
left_menu7Free issueSubscribe
left_menu9Online Edition
left_menu10Distribute
left_menu11Search
side_menu4ArchivesBooks
left_menu12
left_menu13First AmendmentHistoryLinksFirst Amendment
left_menu14Cartoon
Readership3
Video clips
Alerts bottom
uncivil_liberties2

Institute for Truth Studies

John ellis water
Renewable_energy
Amazon1

Support AFP: Visit Our Advertisers

Hot Flashes
The_Black_Widows_Bite
SAVINGS RATE KEY TO ECONOMIC RECOVERY 

  rss202

By Antonius Patrick

A little over a year has now elapsed since the much-criticized “stimulus package” was enacted into law. Despite the legislation’s dismal performance—unemployment remains close to 10 percent—the Obama administration is orchestrating a media blitz touting its supposed benefits in the hopes that enough support can be garnered to pass a “son of stimulus” jobs bill.

As they have demonstrated since the start of the financial crisis and ensuing recession/depression, Democrats and a number of Republicans, most recently newly elected Scott Brown of Massachusetts, have displayed a fundamental lack of understanding on the subject of employment. In only the third vote of what may be a very short career, Brown voted with 55 Democrats and four other Republicans for the newest jobs measure.
 

AFP newsletter ad

In a statement explaining his vote, the senator believed that the measure was “not perfect,” but would “put people back to work.” Although new to the ways of Washington, Brown appears to have quickly mastered how to nuance a sellout: “I hope my vote today is a strong step toward restoring bipartisanship in Washington, D.C.

At one time, most people understood that the creation of employment by the government can only come at the expense of the private sector. The state can create jobs, but it can only do so by levying or raising taxes, printing money or issuing debt. Such actions usually retard employment, the exact opposite of what governments say they hope to achieve.

Government-created jobs are not tied to consumer demand, but instead are “politically mandated.” In the private sector, the creation of employment is directly linked to those industries and services that consumers patronize. Businesses that satisfy consumers expand and grow.

Furthermore, profitable industries attract competitors, which, to successfully compete, have to hire workers, further expanding employment. The point is that in private enterprise, job creation is directly tied to consumers, who, through their purchases, direct resources and labor into those industries that are most responsive to their wants and needs.

Real employment can only come about through the creation of genuine savings not via the printing press, but by abstention from consumption. Production takes place over time; workers have to be paid during the process before goods are finished and sold. Thus, savings are required to pay wages in the present as production takes place.

The greater an economy’s savings rate, the more production projects can be undertaken, and with it more employment. Savings, therefore, provide the means for the payment of wages during the lengthy periods of production.  Wage rates, too, are tied to savings. Businessmen compete with each other not only for consumer patronage, but also for employees. To attract workers, businessmen have to offer better compensation (mostly in wages) than their rivals. The greater an economy’s savings rate is, the more entrepreneurs have to bid workers away from one another. The competition for workers is how wages increase.

The great enemy of savings is taxation. A heavy tax rate discourages people to save since they are penalized even further by abstaining from consumption and paying taxes. Higher tax rates, therefore, will make individuals present-oriented.

In regard to taxation and savings: it is not the type of tax that is important, but the overall tax burden that affects savings. The greater the burden, the lower the savings rate, which results in lower employment and wage rates.

If politicians are really concerned about the unemployment rate, they would abandon plans for further unproductive job programs and start enacting serious tax cut measures, or better yet, abolishing taxes, starting with the egregious federal income tax. Now that is change Americans can really believe in.

Antonius Patrick lives in Virginia and is a finance writer for AFP.

Subscribe to American Free Press. Online subscriptions: One year of weekly editions—$15 plus you get a BONUS ELECTRONIC BOOK - HIGH PRIESTS OF WAR - By Michael Piper.

Print subscriptions: 52 issues crammed into 47 weeks of the year plus six free issues of Whole Body Health: $59  Order on this website or call toll free 1-888-699-NEWS .

Sign up for our free e-newsletter here - get a free gift just for signing up!

(Issue # 13, March 29, 2010)

Send this page to a friend! (click here)

Please make a donation to American Free Press

Not Copyrighted. Readers can reprint and are free to redistribute - as long as full credit is given to American Free Press - 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 100 Washington, D.C. 20003

Support AFP: Visit Our Advertisers

Send this page to a friend! (click here)

 

Issue image


Subscribe Online

16 Weeks

SAE-09-AFP
BetterThanGold120x600
valtorta3
Ron_Paul_Revolution1
Free_silver
BetterThanGold468x60a
Health Insurance Quote
beach-468x60
Gideon