|
Arizona Judge Stood Firm With Sheriff Mack
By Pat Shannan
During the hours
following the Tucson tragedy, as the details slowly emerged and we
learned that a relatively unknown congresswoman was seriously wounded
and a federal judge had been among the six killed, many Americans
wondered if there was a specific target and who that might have been.
More importantly, why was Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) getting all
the ink while Judge John Roll remained virtually unnamed for a whole
day? In this business, we at AFP long ago learned to read the white
part of the newspaper.
We were in good company. Even Texas Republican Rep. Ron Paul’s
daily Internet news release was asking the same questions the following
week. Next, former Arizona Sheriff Richard Mack* came forward with
illuminating information that none of us remembered: Judge Roll was one
of the few “good guys” on the federal bench. He had ruled
favorably in Mack’s case against the Brady Bill in 1994 when Mack
had sued the federales for trying to force him and all the other
sheriffs in America to do their work for them.
Mack took it all the way to the Supreme Court where he finally got the
reversal in 1997 and forced the rewriting of the far less intrusive
Brady Bill.
But earlier in the game, he found himself in Roll’s federal
courtroom fighting a provision in the new statute that threatened to
put him in federal prison. Mack says that Roll seemed sincerely
concerned about federal power to arrest any sheriff that failed to
comply with the federal mandate, even though then-Attorney General
Janet Reno had said that the bill’s language was aimed at gun
shop owners and not the sheriffs.
Roll granted Mack’s injunction against the government for any
arrest for failing to comply. Then the prosecutor told the judge that
in only the first four months of enforcing the Brady Bill the
government had prevented over a quarter million felons from gaining
access to handguns. Disregarding the audacious exaggeration of numbers,
Roll further impressed Mack by telling the prosecutor,
“Counselor, do not pretend in this courtroom that your
statistical analysis somehow equates to constitutionality.”
Mack tells us what Roll included in his ruling on the Mack v. US case:
 |
The court finds that in enacting [the Brady bill] Congress exceeded its
authority under Article 1, section 8 of the United States Constitution,
thereby impermissibly encroaching upon the powers retained by the
states pursuant to the Tenth Amendment. The court further finds that
the provision, in conjunction with the criminal sanctions its violation
would engender, is unconstitutionally vague under the Fifth Amendment
of the United States Constitution.
“Judge Roll,” writes Mack, “of all the dozens of
judges who had heard this case from me and the other six sheriff
defendants, was the only one who ruled that the Brady Bill violated the
Fifth Amendment as well as the Tenth. It was pursuant to Judge
Roll’s insight and sensitivity to the threat this
‘law’ posed to us, the sheriffs, that this case made it to
the U.S. Supreme Court.”
Further into the decision, Mack saw Roll display another principle and
said, “It truly brought me to understand how astonishing this man
really was.”
Roll had said, “Mack is thus forced to choose between keeping his
oath or obeying the act, subjecting himself to possible
sanctions.”
“I have to say that Roll’s understanding of principles
amazed me,” Mack writes today. “He was so professional and
knowledgeable. He took his job and the Constitution so seriously.”
Pima County, Ariz. Sheriff Clarence Dupnik’s ridiculous blaming
of conservative talk show hosts was reminiscent of the same cover-up
ploy at Oklahoma City in 1995, but his public statements regarding Roll
having just dropped by to say “Hi” and his being “in
the wrong place at the wrong time” may merit further examination
considering there have been some questions about who will have
jurisdiction over the crime—the state or the federal government.
FBI Agent Tony Taylor filed an affidavit with the court swearing that
he saw Roll chatting with Gifford’s congressional aide, Ron
Barber, for several minutes prior to the shooting, and that Roll had
been notified by
telephone of the Saturday rally on Friday. Roll was apparently at the
rally to discuss illegal immigration and the extreme caseload imposed
on federal judges in Arizona largely related to immigration cases.
——
*Sheriff Mack will be speaking at the FLS Freedom Conference
to
be held in Southern California Feb. 18-21, 2011.AFP’s Victor
Thorn and
Jim Traficant will also be featured speakers.
Subscribe to American
Free Press. Online
subscriptions: One year of weekly editions—$15 plus you get a
BONUS ELECTRONIC BOOK - HIGH PRIESTS OF WAR - By Michael Piper.
Print
subscriptions: 52 issues crammed into 47 weeks of the year plus six
free issues of Whole Body Health: $59 Order on this website
or call toll free 1-888-699-NEWS .
Sign up for our free e-newsletter here
- get a free gift just for signing up!
(Issue
# 5, January 31, 2011)
|
