San Francisco Tries End-Run Around Second Amendment

The City by the Bay—“on behalf of” California—sues ‘mom and pop’ firearms accessories companies across the country. Dylan Saunders, owner of one such shop, 7.62 Precision, is fighting back.

By Dave Gahary

San Francisco officials recently made news for vowing to protect “undocumented” (read: illegal) immigrants by refusing to order local law enforcement to assist in enforcing federal immigration law and sued the Trump administration over its order to cut off federal funds to sanctuary cities. Now they have a new target in their sights: the Second Amendment.

Dennis J. Herrera, first elected city attorney of San Francisco in 2001, is the most well-known champion of same-sex marriage in the Golden State. Today, he wants to make a name for himself by capitalizing on the many alleged massacres that have been frothily reported by the fake news media.

A week after his attack on the president’s plan to rein in the rampant illegal immigration, Herrera filed suit on Feb. 9 against five named and 50 unnamed companies selling “magazine repair kits” to California residents, who have had their Second Amendment rights severely limited by gun control-crazy politicians.

Bug Out While You Still Can! Learn More…

Magazine repair or rebuild kits are new magazines that have been opened, disassembled, and packaged for shipping and are used to repair existing magazines, create limited-capacity magazines, or otherwise assembled and used in accordance with local laws and restrictions.

On the first page of the 34-page complaint, the lawsuit evokes several so-called massacres that have ostensibly occurred in this country over the past decade.

American Free Press sat down with the owner of one of the five named companies, Alaska-based 7.62 Precision, to discuss the lawsuit.

NWO in action cover

Dylan Saunders, who “grew up in Alaska mostly in bush villages without electricity or running water” and “spent some time in the U.S. Army as a cavalry scout and later as a sniper in an infantry unit,” lives in Wasilla, Alaska, where former Gov. Sarah Palin was mayor for six years.

“I was injured in Iraq and came back trying to figure out how to support my family,” Dylan told AFP. “So I started doing what I knew, and that was working with firearms as a way to try to pay the bills.”

Listen to AFP’s interview with Dylan Saunders by clicking the image below:

He added, “Several weeks ago I was very surprised to get a knock at my door at about 10:30 in the evening and receive a summons stating that I was being sued.”

Saunders explained how he got tangled up in this lawsuit.

“California some years ago passed a law that prohibited most people in California from purchasing what they call a ‘large capacity magazine,’ which would be anything larger than 10 rounds,” Saunders explained. “In the language of that law, they clearly allowed for magazine repair kits to be sold to residents of California, in order to keep grandfathered magazines working. Magazines are consumable items in firearms. They wear out, and they’re usually one of the first components to wear out. So, in order to keep a firearm running you need to be able to repair your magazines since they couldn’t replace them.”

Liberty Stickers

When California banned magazine repair kits a few years ago, Saunders stopped selling them.

However, Herrera’s legal staff had simply accessed an old web page from Saunders’s website, where ordering the kits is impossible. Once published on the World Wide Web, all pages remain accessible, even pages and websites that no longer exist.

“Had they simply called me and asked if they could order one from me or even called me and told me that it was the attorney for the city of San Francisco,” Saunders said, “I would’ve been willing to prove to him that I was not selling these kits and had not intended for that page to be visible. But instead of getting that, they simply sued.”

Saunders suspects there is another agenda at play here.

“It’s pretty obvious that their intent is not to keep people from selling magazine kits in the state of California. Their intention is to attack firearms companies and try to put them out of business,” Saunders said. “That’s why they’re using lawsuits rather than criminal charges. In the case of criminal charges, they would have to prove that a crime had been committed, while they can bring a lawsuit and hope to bankrupt a company without actually having to win the lawsuit, without having to provide proof. A lot of companies would just fold as a result.”

Instead of folding, Saunders fought back, by tapping into what is called crowdfunding, by which a project (in this case, legal fees) is funded by raising money collectively from a large number of people across the world.

“These guys were going to get a default judgment if I couldn’t retain a law firm, so what I did was I established a GoFundMe campaign,” Saunders explained. “I was blown away that people from all over the United States jumped in. I think it was less than a week we’d raised $10,000, which was our goal.”

Saunders has retained a top-notch law firm thanks to the donations, and is still overwhelmed by the support.

“We had people donating hundreds of dollars,” he said. “I was expecting that people would donate $15, $20, $25, and maybe some people would go big and donate $50, but I was just blown away by the support, both monetary and by people sending messages and saying, ‘We’re pulling for you in this.’ It really says something about our country and about shooters across the country.”

Dave Gahary, a former submariner in the U.S. Navy, prevailed in a suit brought by the New York Stock Exchange in an attempt to silence him.




Are You a Mind-Controlled CIA Stooge?

Do you smirk when you hear someone question the official stories of San Bernardino, Paris, or Nice? Do you feel superior to 2,500 architects and engineers, commercial and military pilots, physicists and chemists, and former high government officials who raise doubts about 9-11? If so, you reflect the profile of a mind-controlled CIA stooge.

By Paul Craig Roberts

The term “conspiracy theory” was invented and put into public discourse by the CIA in 1964 in order to discredit the many skeptics who challenged the Warren Commission’s conclusion that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated by a lone gunman named Lee Harvey Oswald, who himself was assassinated while in police custody before he could be questioned. The CIA used its friends in the media to launch a campaign to make suspicion of the Warren Commission report a target of ridicule and hostility. This campaign was “one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.”

So writes political science professor Lance deHaven-Smith, who in his peer-reviewed book, Conspiracy Theory in America, published by the University of Texas Press, tells the story of how the CIA succeeded in creating in the public mind reflexive, automatic, stigmatization of those who challenge government explanations. This is an extremely important and readable book, one of those rare books with the power to break you out of the Matrix.

^D26C220E1A41DA33819518B0515EF50351FA2B18133ECE67AD^pimgpsh_fullsize_distr

DeHaven-Smith is able to write this book because the original CIA Dispatch #1035-960, which sets out the CIA plot, was obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request. Apparently, the bureaucracy did not regard a document this old as being of any importance. The document is marked “Destroy when no longer needed,” but somehow wasn’t. CIA Dispatch #1035-960 is reproduced in the book.

Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More . . .

The success that the CIA has had in stigmatizing skepticism of government explanations has made it difficult to investigate state crimes against democracy (SCAD) such as 9-11. With the public mind programmed to ridicule “conspiracy kooks,” even in the case of suspicious events such as 9-11 the government can destroy evidence, ignore prescribed procedures, delay an investigation, and then form a political committee to put its imprimatur on the official story. DeHaven-Smith notes that in such events as Kennedy’s assassination and 9-11 official police and prosecutorial investigations are never employed. The event is handed off to a political commission.

DeHaven-Smith’s book supports what I have told my readers: the government controls the story from the beginning by having the official explanation ready the moment a SCAD occurs. This makes any other explanation a “conspiracy theory.”

This is the way deHaven-Smith puts it:

“A SCAD approach to memes assumes further that the CIA and other possibly participating agencies are formulating memes well in advance of operations, and therefore SCAD memes appear and are popularized very quickly before any competing concepts are on the scene.”

The CIA’s success in controlling public perception of what our founding fathers would have regarded as suspicious events involving the government enables those in power positions within government to orchestrate events that serve hidden agendas. The events of Sept. 11 created the new paradigm of endless war in behalf of a Washington-dominated world. The CIA’s success in controlling public perceptions has made it impossible to investigate elite political crimes. Consequently, it is now possible for treason to be official U.S. government policy.



 

DeHaven-Smith’s book will tell you the story of the assassination of President Kennedy by elements of the U.S. military, CIA, and Secret Service. Just as the Warren Commission covered up SCAD, deHaven-Smith shows why we should doubt the official 9-11 story. And anything else that the government tells us.

Read this book. It is short. It is affordable. It is reality preparation. It will inoculate you against being a dumbshit, insouciant, brainwashed American.

Donate to us

I am surprised that the CIA has not purchased the entire print run and burned the books. Perhaps the CIA feels secure from its success in brainwashing the public and does not believe that American democracy and accountable government can be restored.

Paul Craig Roberts was assistant secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of The Wall Street Journal. He was columnist forBusinessWeek, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts’ latest books are How AMERICA Was LOST: From 9/11 to the Police/Warfare State and The NEOCONSERVATIVE THREAT to WORLD ORDER: Washington’s Perilous War for Hegemony.

 




Conquistador Trump Journeys to Mexico, Reaffirms Tough Immigration Policies

In accepting the invitation of Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto to fly to Mexico City, Republican Presidential candidate Donald Trump was taking a major risk. Yet it was a bold and decisive move, and it paid off in what was the best day of Trump’s campaign, casting him as truly presidential with this provocative move.

By Patrick J. Buchanan

Standing beside President Enrique Pena Nieto in Mexico City, graciously complimenting him and speaking warmly of Mexico and its people, Donald Trump looked like a president. And the Mexican president treated him like one, even as Trump restated the basic elements of his immigration policy, including the border wall.

The gnashing of teeth up at The New York Times testifies to Trump’s triumph:

“Mr. Trump has spent his entire campaign painting Mexico as a nation of rapists, drug smugglers, and trade hustlers. .  . . But instead of chastising Mr. Trump, Mr. Pena Nieto treated him like a visiting head of state . . . with side-by-side lecterns and words of deferential mush.”

Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More . . .

As I wrote in August, Trump “must convince the nation . . . he is an acceptable, indeed, a preferable alternative” to Hillary Clinton, whom the nation does not want.

In Mexico City, Trump did that. He reassured voters who are leaning toward him that he can be president. As for those who are apprehensive about his temperament, they saw reassurance.

For validation, one need not rely on supporters of Trump. Even Mexicans who loathe Trump are conceding his diplomatic coup.

“Trump achieved his purpose,” said journalism professor Carlos Bravo Regidor. “He looked serene, firm, presidential.” Our “humiliation is now complete,” tweeted an anchorman at Televisa.

Nieto’s invitation to Trump “was the biggest stupidity in the history of the Mexican presidency,” said academic Jesus Silva-Herzog. Not since Gen. Winfield Scott arrived for a visit in 1847 have Mexican elites been this upset with an American. Jorge Ramos of Univision almost required sedation.

When Trump got back to the States, he affirmed that Mexico will be paying for the wall, even if “they don’t know it yet.”



 

Indeed, back on American soil, in Phoenix, the Donald doubled down. Deportations will accelerate when he takes office, beginning with felons. Sanctuary cities for illegal immigrants will face U.S. sanctions. There will be no amnesty, no legalization, no path to citizenship for those who have broken into our country. All laws will be enforced.

Trump’s stance in Mexico City and Phoenix reveals that there is no turning back. The die is cast. He is betting the election on his belief that the American people prefer his stands to Clinton’s call for amnesty.

A core principle enunciated by Trump in Phoenix appears to be a guiding light behind his immigration policy:

“Anyone who tells you that the core issue is the needs of those living here illegally has simply spent too much time Washington. . . . There is only one core issue in the immigration debate, and that issue is the well-being of the American people. . . . Nothing even comes a close second.”

The “well-being of the American people” may be the yardstick by which U.S. policies will be measured in a Trump presidency. This is also applicable to Trump’s stand on trade and foreign policy.

Do NAFTA, the WTO, MFN for China, the South Korea deal and TPP advance the “well-being of the American people”? Or do they serve more the interests of foreign regimes and corporate elites?

Some $12 trillion in trade deficits since George H. W. Bush gives you the answer.

Which of the military interventions and foreign wars from Serbia to Afghanistan to Iraq to Libya to Yemen to Syria served the “well-being of the American people”?

Are the American people well served by commitments in perpetuity to 60- and 65-year-old treaties to wage war on Russia and China on behalf of scores of nations across Eurasia, most of which have been free riders on U.S. defense for decades?

Trump’s “core issue” might be called “Americanism.”

Whatever the outcome of this election, these concerns are not going away. For they have arisen out of a deeply dissatisfied and angry electorate that is alienated from the elites in both parties. Indeed, alienation explains the endurance of Trump, despite his recent difficulties. Americans want change, and he alone offers it.

Donate to us

In the last two weeks, Trump has seen a slow rise in the polls, matched by a perceptible decline in support for Hillary Clinton. The latest Rasmussen poll now has Trump at 40, with Mrs. Clinton slipping to 39.

This race is now Trump’s to win or lose. For he alone brings a fresh perspective to policies that have stood stagnant under both parties.

And Mrs. Clinton? Whatever her attributes, she is uncharismatic, unexciting, greedy, wonkish, scripted and devious, an individual you can neither fully believe nor fully trust.

Which is why the country seems to be looking, again to Trump to show them that they will not be making a big mistake if they elect him.

If Trump can continue to show America what he did in Mexico City, that he can be presidential, he may just become president.

Pat Buchanan is a writer, political commentator and presidential candidate. He is the author of The Greatest Comeback: How Richard Nixon Rose From Defeat to Create the New Majority and Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?

COPYRIGHT 2016 CREATORS.COM




Hillary Orders Blackout of Tell-All Tome

Gary Byrne, a former Secret Service agent and bodyguard for President Bill Clinton, sat down with AMERICAN FREE PRESS to discuss his new book, Crisis of Character, as well as what the United States will look like should Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton win the election on Nov. 8 and take the White House.

By Dave Gahary

This newspaper has been writing for years about a mainstream media conspiracy at the highest levels, and now a No. 1 bestselling book is providing the evidence of such.

AMERICAN FREE PRESS sat down for a 90-minute exclusive interview with the author of Crisis of Character: A White House Secret Service Officer Discloses His Firsthand Experience with Hillary, Bill, and How They Operate. Gary J. Byrne paints a picture of a scandalous, dysfunctional, and disturbed Clinton presidency, much more concerned with getting the upper hand for themselves rather than for the American people.

Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More . . .

In fact, the book is so powerful and potentially damaging to the Clintons, and especially Hillary Clinton’s presidential candidacy, that, on her orders, the entire mainstream media industry in the U.S. and abroad, except for Fox News, has refused to even acknowledge the book’s existence, other than to trash it.

 25_26_Crisis_of_Character_Banner

Although not a household name, Byrne has a place in the annals of American history for a number of reasons. His book should be considered a national treasure since he provides the reader with an insider’s view of the most respected building on U.S. soil not available other than by reading the book. Byrne had to know every nook and cranny of the White House and its inhabitants.

Significantly, Byrne was the first Secret Service employee ever forced to testify against a sitting president in a criminal case, when he got sucked into the Monica Lewinsky scandal while trying to protect the president from himself and Miss Lewinsky’s machinations.

“I was subpoenaed six times and eventually ordered to testify by Supreme Court Chief Justice Rehnquist,” he explained.

Byrne, a Pennsylvania native, joined the U.S. Air Force in 1982, where he was a security policeman until 1986. In 1991, he got the opportunity to join the U.S. Secret Service Uniformed Division (SSUD), where he spent 12 years from 1991 to 2003, including almost four years guarding the Oval Office during the Clinton administration, racking up 29 years total in federal service.

His service included several years conducting White House tours, which are led by members of the White House staff and Secret Service, as an instructor at the Secret Service training facility in Maryland, and 13 years as a Federal air marshal, flying over 4 million air miles.

“It was a dream come true for me,” he said. “I like to say that I came in with Papa Bush and I left with Son Bush, and in between I protected the Clintons for eight years.”

As Byrne explains on page 20, the SSUD “ranks among the nation’s most powerful law enforcement agencies,” and SSUD officers have “more arresting power” than any law enforcement agency, including other Secret Service agents.



 

Byrne decided to write the book when he heard Mrs. Clinton was going to make another run for the White House.

“I lived through the eight years of her husband and his presidency, so I felt compelled to tell my story,” he said. “I wanted the American people to know who the real Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton are before they have to make this decision for this election.”

He continued: “The only transparency that a lot of people really get on the Clinton machine is from my book. I feel this is my mission—to get the truth out there. If people still want to vote for her because that’s their beliefs, I’m fine with that, that’s our system. But know what the truth is and then act on it.”

Byrne said Mrs. Clinton has a long history of lying, deception, and scheming.

“One of the first jobs that Hillary Clinton had as a young lawyer was working on the Watergate case,” he explained. “The person that hired her, the lead Democrat in charge of the investigation, actually fired her for dishonesty.”

And in regard to the now infamous private Clinton email server, he said: “Who was a U.S. senator for eight years and doesn’t know she can’t set up her own private server? The only reason you would do that is to hide information.”

Byrne told this interviewer a particularly disturbing story:

“A new officer, a U.S. Army vet who was in Somalia, . . . was walking down the West Colonnade—built for Thomas Jefferson, and now used by the president and his staff to travel between the West Wing and the Executive Residence—and he’s walking toward the mansion.

The first lady’s walking toward him, and he says, ‘Good morning, First Lady,’ and she looks at him and says, ‘Go [expletive deleted] yourself.’ ”

Byrne explained to this interviewer the background of how his book was blacklisted.

“Right before my book came out we actually had scheduled with ABC, CBS, and ‘The Today Show,’ ” he began. “And according to one person who works for the Fox Network who was talking to another booker from a radio show, they made it so very clear to this booker that under no circumstances could they have me on the show. And this was the Clintons who put pressure on them.”

Donate to us

Byrne pointed to the irony of the book ban.

“Every news agency in the world wanted to talk to us [during the Monica Lewinsky scandal], but we didn’t because we followed the directions of the Secret Service. Now that I’m coming out and telling my story, they’re buckling to pressure from Mrs. Clinton. . . . They’re squashing me because they’re afraid of the truth. They know what I saw. They know what they did, and they’re terrified of it.”

Even though the entire mainstream media except for Fox is moving in lockstep and shutting the book down, it’s still doing beyond well.

“It’s gonna be on the New York Times bestseller list, number one, five weeks in a row,” he said.

Dave Gahary, a former submariner in the U.S. Navy, is the host of AFP’s “Underground Interview” series.




Evidence of Whitewashed Civil War Massacre Found in the Trash

In an exclusive interview with AMERICAN FREE PRESS, Clint Lacy, the author of the book Blood in the Ozarks: Union War Crimes Against Southern Sympathizers and Civilians in Occupied Missouri, provides new details on a Christmas Day war crime that was carried out  Union soldiers during the Civil War and then covered up for over a century.

By Dave Gahary

Sometimes events can innocently conspire to create significant results, as in the case of the book Blood in the Ozarks: Union War Crimes Against Southern Sympathizers and Civilians in Occupied Missouri. If not for a chance occurrence and some determination, the deaths of around 100 men, women, and children might have never come to light.

Author Clint Lacy sat down with AMERICAN FREE PRESS to discuss the genesis of his book and the importance of its subject matter, a heretofore obscure event that occurred nearly 153 years ago.

Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More . . .

Lacy’s interest in this time period was spurred by a simple question.


You can listen to AFP’s exclusive interview with author Clint Lacy by clicking the listen button below:

podcast-play-button


“Before my grandmother passed,” Lacy began, “I asked her about our family history and she seemed to recall hearing a story of an uncle in Kentucky who went to go fight for the South. And after she passed I asked a great aunt of mine if she knew anything about that, and it turned out that ancestor was actually one of the 10 men captured with Jefferson Davis in Georgia at the end of the war.”

Ozarks Button

In 2005, Lacy gave a speech in Missouri at the site of a huge “Civil War” battle, “trying to tell the attendees, paint a picture for them of why these men fought and why these men would risk their lives in such a bloody, bloody charge.”

“One of the characters I mentioned in this speech was the Rev. Jesse Pratt,” Lacy explained.

In December 1863, Pratt, who was with the 15th Missouri Cavalry CSA, caught about 100 members of the Union’s Third Missouri State Militia Cavalry. Word passed to Union troops, who set out to rescue their comrades.

Lacy then brought up an obscure event known as the Wilson Massacre.

“Maj. James Wilson, commander of the 3rd Missouri Cavalry, found where the men had been taken,” explained Lacy, and they reached camp during a Christmas dinner.

“And the story goes that women, children, and the elderly as well as the soldiers were massacred in this event,” he said.

Around three years before Lacy’s speech, a historical fiction novel entitled Enemy Women by a best-selling author appeared.

“At the beginning of every chapter there was a historical fact,” said Lacy. “And at the beginning of one of those chapters was the story of the Wilson Massacre.”

“This book became a bestseller,” he explained, “and the Wilson Massacre was no longer just a local legend after that. It became national news about a war crime that happened on Christmas

Day 1863.”

The author, Paulette Jiles, got a lot of her information for the book from a local author, Jerry Ponder, who had uncovered, by chance, some important documents.

“There used to be two libraries in Doniphan, Mo., a county library and city library,” said Lacy, “and they were consolidated in the early 1990s.

Jerry saw them throwing a lot of books and papers out into the dumpster, and he thought there

might be something valuable there.”

He was right. Two of the documents discussed the Wilson Massacre.

Lacy got in touch with Jerry, who was close to death, but still mailed out the documents.

“One of them has a Doniphan Public Library stamp right on the top of the paper,” he said.

Lacy began his book soon after that, and after nearly a decade of struggling, the rest is, well, accurate history.



 

AFP asked why this event that happened more than 150 years ago is so important today.

“Three reasons,” Lacy quickly answered. “First and foremost, the honor of a good man, Jerry Ponder, has been maligned and dragged through the mud by critics. Second, there’s an old saying that if you don’t know your history you’re doomed to repeat it. And third, these men who were massacred, and their families—these men were standing up for states rights against a government that overstepped its bounds. Who is to say that with the overreach of government today, people that stand up for states rights and the Constitution won’t be murdered today like they were back then?”

Donate to us

Be sure to check out Lacy’s article in the latest BARNES REVIEW where he writes about an important chapter of the Civil War, which Lacy refers to as “a war of Northern aggression or an illegal invasion.”

Dave Gahary, a former submariner in the U.S. Navy, is the host of AFP’s “Underground Interview” series.




Immigration or Annihilation

The alien invasion of Europe has largely been brought about as a result of decades of war that have devastated the Middle East and North Africa. But this so-called “refugee crisis” is less about “enrichment.” It is really more about the “extermination” of distinct cultures in Europe as well as the majority white population on the continent.

By Ronald L. Ray

At what point does the introduction of a foreign population endanger the continued existence of a country’s native people, especially if the aliens are unassimilated or unassimilable? How many millions of foreigners does it take to overturn a civilization? We do not know, but the percentage is far less than half of the total population.

In a nation or continent whose leaders treasonously abet the invaders, that percentage may be as low as 10%-15%, as we now are witnessing in Europe.

The face of the foreign invasion issue, whether in Europe or America, seems always to be evolving—no doubt following the hidden plan of the Controllers. In Europe—the focus of this article—the aliens are primarily Middle Eastern, African or Gypsy, and almost all Muslim. They are a scimitar put to the heart of white populations and Western Christian culture, bringing violence, crime, and other antisocial behaviors with them.

Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More . . .

Two recent events demonstrate the ongoing war. On July 26, two Islamic assailants entered St. Étienne’s Catholic Church in Saint-Étienne-du Rouvray, France, near Rouen in Normandy. Their attack occurred at the morning Mass, during which they took hostage most of those present, including two nuns and the priest offering the Mass, Fr. Jacques Hamel, 86 years old. In an action all too symbolic, one of the men murdered the aged and well-liked priest by cutting his throat. The two men reportedly also preached Islam to the captives before the attackers ultimately were killed by special operations forces, yet authorities ridiculously struggled to find a motive for the men’s actions, one of whom had been under house arrest for attempting to reach Syria last year.

In response to the violent attack, Pope Francis refused to condemn Islam as the cause of this or other troubles, such as pederasty and the massive numbers of white women raped by alien scum. In Italy, the bishops held sacrilegious interfaith services with Muslim clergy in Catholic churches.

Instead of sending priests to convert the infidels, the politically and morally compromised hierarchy defends the presence of Muslims and other problematic foreign invaders, and excuses their destructive behavior. That is simply demented—and dangerous.

In a related incident, the website SPEISA reported the seemingly surprising claim by a Muslim group that Denmark will become the first Islamic state in Europe. The facts revealed make the claim shockingly likely.

A website purporting to be that of the “Danish Muslim Party” issued the statement, predicting that the Muslim political party soon will become the largest in the small Nordic country and impose sharia—which will, of course, clean up some moral decadence, only to replace it with a different type. The press release asserted that 1 million Islamists, 20-50 years of age, will move to Denmark as soon as Turkey becomes a European Union member, thanks to the open borders requirement.

That is not far-fetched. Denmark already has 700,000 Muslim residents, according to Mathaba News Network, and disturbingly, they comprise about a third of the Danish parliament. In Europe’s multi-party parliamentary systems, that is often more than sufficient to control the government.

On the positive side, a growing number of native Europeans is finally waking up to the self destructive stupidity of unlimited immigration.



 

But a few protests are not enough without action. One Polish town has closed its border with Germany, while Hungarians are set to reject European Union immigrant quotas in an upcoming referendum.

What is needed, though, is something far more radical, as the white European population implodes. Demography is destiny. But a recent proposal by the Alternative for Germany (AfD) Party to provide loans to German citizens for having children—which are amortized by having more children—was ridiculed by every other German party, including the Christian Democrats, as “racist,” “xenophobic,” and, naturally, “Nazist.”

Of course, the same parties happily spend hundreds of times that much on illegal aliens.

The increasingly angry native European population can do little against the plutocratic and political elites’ treacherous promotion of a societally overwhelming mass of foreigners. As many as 4 million are expected this year. That is four times 2015’s number. Europeans were deprived of effective firearms ownership long ago. Yet the illegal invaders have no problem getting knives, guns, and ammunition, suggesting government collusion in recent mass killings and crime.

Donate to us

The alien problem in Europe is only a symptom. We must remember who began and who directs the foreign invasion of Europe—and of America. It is those diabolical forces bent on implementing the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan for the destruction of Christianity, the genocidal mongrelization of the white race, and, ultimately, world domination by a handful of elites. But will the traditional peoples of Europe have the intelligence and courage to cut off the head of the serpent?

CORRECTION: One of our readers in Sweden wrote to point out that the portion of “Immigration or Annihilation” regarding the Danish Muslim Party (DAMP) is incorrect. The errors appear to result from possible mistranslation into English by our original source. There seemingly are not 700,000 Muslims in Denmark already. In fact, the number of Muslims, according to official Danish sources, is significantly smaller. The larger number, provided by DAMP, seems to have been wishful thinking by a “political party” whose website no longer exists. Also, the claim that the Danish Parliament is one-third Muslim was in fact merely DAMP’s belief that they could realistically achieve that level of representation. In actuality, the Danes may be among the Europeans most awake to the dangers of unfettered foreign invasion. The nationalist Danish Peoples Party has been enjoying steady growth in support and firmly opposes the entry of Muslims into the Nordic country. Nevertheless, the Islamic threat to traditional European peoples and cultures is quite real throughout the continent and Great Britain. AFP sincerely regrets the reporting error.

Ronald L. Ray is a freelance author and an assistant editor of The Barnes Review. He is a descendant of several patriots of the American War for Independence. Contact Ron by email at write2ron@yandex.com.




China Backs Russia’s War Against ISIS in Syria

Could this be the worst nightmare for Washington neoconservatives? The Chinese military is now moving into Syria in order to come to the assistance of Russian President Vladimir Putin and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad defeat the U.S.- and Israeli-made radical Islamic terror group known as the Islamic State (ISIS).

By Richard Walker

For some time, China has been quietly backing Russia’s war against radical terrorist groups in Syria by sending teams of military advisors to assist Russian specialists running Moscow’s air, ground, and Special Forces campaign against ISIS and its affiliates.

From China’s perspective, the war against ISIS has to be won in Syria if China, Russia, and the West are to escape terrorists filtering out of the Middle East into territories bordering China, Russia, and Europe.

Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More . . .

The Chinese military support will increase in the coming months, and contrary to some denials, Washington has been aware of China’s unpublicized military contribution to Moscow’s alliance with the government of Bashar al-Assad.

In 2015, China’s foreign ministry was unambiguous in voicing public backing for Russian air strikes, which it said were aimed at ensuring “international security.” China is also helping with the targeting of the al-Nusra Front, al Qaeda, and other extreme Islamic groups, some of which are being trained and armed by Washington and Israel.

One of the absurd elements of the mass media reporting of recent events in Syria was the widely reported claim that Russia’s use of the Hamedan airbase in Iran to launch an attack against ISIS in Syria happened without the West being notified.

Major news outlets insisted that the Obama administration and its surrogates in the Pentagon and on Capitol Hill were taken unawares by the Russian decision to use the base in Iran. This is untrue. Washington and Beijing were both informed well in advance by Moscow. Sources this writer spoke with in Eastern Europe acknowledged that it was never a closely guarded secret, just as China’s military role in Syria has not been hidden from Washington.

One wonders how the mass media will react if, as is possible, Turkey, which has reset its relations with Moscow, encourages Russia to fly joint sorties into Syria from its Incirlik base, which is presently used by the U.S.

Several people with direct knowledge of Turkey-U.S. relations told AFP that Washington was nervous about the prospect of Russia being given access to the base where NATO nukes are stored. One source claimed the Pentagon has been pleading with the Turks to deny Russia access. Meanwhile, Beijing’s leaders are as puzzled as Russia’s by Washington’s continued fixation with regime change in Syria and its willingness to be linked to extreme Islamic fighters tied to ISIS.

From a Chinese perspective, Washington’s policy is not only furthering the growth of ISIS, but is destabilizing the region.



 

A diplomat who asked to remain anonymous put it to AFP succinctly: “Washington says it wants to talk to Russia about joint operations, but only on condition that Russia agrees to pull its support from Assad and at some point leave him in the wind. The problem with that hair-brained policy is that if Assad falls, the way will be cleared for ISIS and its fellow travelers to add Syria to its caliphate.”

A Russian source was much blunter: “Had it been left to powerbrokers in Washington, Assad would be in his grave like [Libyan leader Muammar] Qadaffi and Saddam Hussein, and [ISIS] would be running the show in Syria. We believe the CIA convinced the White House and powerful figures in Congress that if they got rid of Assad Turkey would partner with the Saudis to run Syria for the West by controlling ISIS and its associates.

That is a mad scheme. Turkey has learned you cannot do business with terrorists. It is time for the CIA to disengage from the extreme elements it is tied to in the Middle East.”

The diplomat’s point about Turkey was recently reinforced by Turkey’s plea to Moscow to let it join the Russian military in targeting ISIS.

The Turkish turnaround exposes not only weaknesses in the NATO alliance, but Washington’s confused policy in the region.

Some NATO allies in Europe are privately voicing concerns about Washington’s growing antagonism toward Russia and in particular its willingness to continue to pursue the neocon agenda of regime change in Syria.

Minds are unlikely to change in the U.S. Attitudes towards Russia will likely harden should Hillary Clinton win the White House race.

In Europe, where immigration and Syria are daily topics in the media and at dinner tables, there are also serious worries that Cold War policies will drag the continent back into a militaristic past. While many have eyes on Ukraine, others see a potential conflict between Russia and NATO in the Arctic.

Donate to us

In related news, reports are now surfacing that Turkey is secretly planning a ground force to go into northern Syria to attack the Kurds. That would place Turkey in confrontation with its NATO ally, the U.S., which has Special Forces teams in that part of Syria training Kurds and “others.”

Recently, Washington accused the Syrian and Russian air forces of targeting U.S. teams operating with the Kurds and warned of possible retaliation.

This would be a major escalation of the conflict and would force NATO to question whether Turkey should continue to be a member of NATO.




Obamacare Is Dying a Slow Death

The Affordable Care Act—also known as “Obamacare”—which passed into law by Congress and signed by President Barack Obama in 2010, is dying a slow death due to major insurance companies pulling out because they are losing money despite the fact that they have more customers than ever and are subsidized by taxpayers.

By Rep. Ron Paul

The decision of several major insurance companies to cut their losses and withdraw from the Obamacare exchanges, combined with the failure of 70% of Obamacare’s health insurance “co-ops, ” will leave one in six Obamacare enrollees with only one health insurance option. If Obamacare continues on its current track, most of America may resemble Pinal County, Ariz., where no one can obtain private health insurance. Those lucky enough to obtain insurance will face ever-increasing premiums and a declining choice of providers.

Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More . . .

Many Obamacare supporters claimed that the exchanges created a market for health insurance that would allow consumers to benefit from competition. But allowing consumers to pick from a variety of government-controlled health insurance plans is not a true market; instead it is what the great economist Ludwig von Mises called “playing market.”

HealthPromoWebsite

Unfortunately, if not surprisingly, too many are drawing the wrong lessons from Obamacare’s difficulties. Instead of calling for a repeal of Obamacare and all other government interference in the healthcare market, many are calling for increased penalties on those who defy Obamacare’s individual mandate in order to force them onto the exchanges. Others are renewing the push for a “public option,” forcing private companies to compete with taxpayer-funded entities and easing the way for the adoption of a Canadian-style single payer system.

Even those working to restore individual control over healthcare via tax deductions, credits, and expanded health savings accounts still support government intervention in order to provide a “safety net” for the poor. Of course, everyone—including libertarians—shares the goal of creating a safety net. Libertarians just understand that a moral and effective safety net is one voluntarily provided by individuals, religious organizations, and private charities.

Government has no legitimate authority to take money from taxpayers to fund healthcare or any other type of welfare program. Government-run healthcare also does not truly serve the interest of those supposedly “benefiting” from the program. Anyone who doubts this should consider how declining reimbursements and increasing bureaucracy is causing more doctors to refuse to treat Medicaid and Medicare patients.



 

Medicaid patients will face increasing hardships when, not if, the U.S. government’s fiscal crisis forces Congress to make spending cuts. When the crisis comes, what is more likely to be cut first: spending benefiting large corporations and big banks that can deploy armies of high-powered lobbyists, or spending benefiting low-income Americans who cannot afford K Street representation?

Contrary to myth, low-income individuals did not go without care in the days before the welfare state. Private, charity-run hospitals staffed by volunteers provided a safety net for those who could not afford health care. Most doctors also willingly provided free or reduced-price care for those who needed it. The large amount of charitable giving and volunteer activity in the United States shows that the American people do not need government’s help in providing an effective safety net.

Donate to us

The problems plaguing the health care system are rooted in the treatment of health care as a “right.” This justifies government intervention in the health care marketplace. This intervention causes increasing prices and declining quality and supply. Ironically, those who suffer most from government intervention are the very people proponents of these programs claim to want to help. The first step in restoring a health care system that meets the needs of all people is to start treating health care as a good that can and should only be provided via voluntary actions of free people.

Ron Paul, a former U.S. representative from Texas and medical doctor, continues to write his column “Texas Straight Talk” for the Ron Paul Institute.




Will Special Prosecutor Investigate Hillary’s Pay-to-Play Scheme?

If Hillary Clinton wins the election on Nov. 8 and takes the White House, it is likely Congress will initiate a probe into allegations of corruption on the part of the former secretary of state and investigate whether Mrs. Clinton sold access to the State Department in return for sizable contributions to the Clinton Foundation.

By Patrick J. Buchanan

Prediction: If Hillary Clinton wins, within a year of her inauguration, she will be under investigation by a special prosecutor on charges of political corruption, thereby continuing a family tradition.

For consider what the Associated Press reported this week:

Of 154 outsiders whom Clinton phoned or met with in her first two years at State, 85 had made contributions to the Clinton Foundation, and their contributions, taken together, totaled $156 million.

Conclusion: Access to Secretary of State Clinton could be bought, but it was not cheap. Forty of the 85 donors gave $100,000 or more. Twenty of those whom Clinton met with or phoned dumped in $1 million or more.

Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More . . .

To get to the seventh floor of the Clinton State Department for a hearing for one’s plea, the cover charge was high.

Among those who got face time with Hillary Clinton were a Ukrainian oligarch and steel magnate who shipped oil pipe to Iran in violation of U.S. sanctions and a Bangladeshi economist who was under investigation by his government and was eventually pressured to leave his own bank.

The stench is familiar, and all too Clintonian in character.

Recall. On his last day in office, Jan. 20, 2001, Bill Clinton issued a presidential pardon to financier-crook and fugitive from justice Marc Rich, whose wife, Denise, had contributed $450,000 to the Clinton Library.

The Clintons appear belatedly to have recognized their political peril.

Bill has promised that, if Hillary is elected, he will end his big dog days at the foundation and stop taking checks from foreign regimes and entities, and corporate donors. Cash contributions from wealthy Americans will still be gratefully accepted.

One wonders: Will Bill be writing thank-you notes for the millions that will roll in to the family foundation — on White House stationery?

By his actions, Bill is all but conceding that there is a serious conflict of interest between his foundation raking in millions that enhance the family’s prestige and sustain its travel and lifestyle, while providing its big donors with privileged access to the secretary of state.

Yet if Hillary Clinton becomes president, the scheme is unsustainable. Even the Obama-Clinton media might not be able to stomach this.

And even Clinton seems to be conceding the game is up. “I know there’s a lot of smoke, and there’s no fire,” she said in self-defense this week.

She is certainly right about the smoke.

And if, as Democratic apparatchik Steve McMahon assures us that there is “no smoking gun,” no quid-pro-quo, no open-and-shut case of Secretary Clinton taking official action in gratitude to a donor of the family foundation, how can we predict a special prosecutor?

Answer: We are not at the end of this scandal. We are at what Churchill called the “end of the beginning.”

Missing emails are being unearthed at State, through Freedom of Information Act requests, that are filling out the picture Clinton thought had been blotted out when her 33,000 “private” emails were erased by her lawyers.

Someone out there, Julian Assange, Russia, or the rogue websites doing all this hacking, are believed to have many more explosive emails they are preparing to drop before Election Day.

And why is Clinton keeping her State Department calendar secret from the AP, if it does not contain meetings or calls she does not want to defend? She has defied requests and the AP had to sue to get the schedule of her first two years at State.

Moreover, the AP story on the State Department-Clinton Foundation links was so stunning it is sure to trigger follow-up by investigative journalists who can smell a Pulitzer.



 

Then there are the contacts between Huma Abedin, her closest aide at State, and Doug Band at the Clinton Foundation, the go-betweens for the donor-Clinton meetings, which has opened a new avenue for investigators.

These were unearthed by Judicial Watch, which is not going away.

The number of persons of interest involved in this suppurating scandal, which has gone from an illicit server, to a panoply of Clinton lies to the public that disgusted the FBI director, to erased emails, to “pay for play,” and now deep into the Clinton Foundation continues to grow.

Donate to us

All that is needed now, to bring us to an independent counsel, is calls for the FBI to reopen and broaden its investigation in light of all that has been revealed since Director Comey said there was not evidence enough to recommend an indictment.

If Clinton controls the Justice Department, calls for a special prosecutor will be resisted, but only until public demand becomes too great.

For there were independent counsels called in Watergate, Iran-Contra and the scandals that led to the impeachment of Bill Clinton.

Hillary Clinton says there is no fire. But something is causing all that smoke.

Pat Buchanan is a writer, political commentator and presidential candidate. He is the author of The Greatest Comeback: How Richard Nixon Rose From Defeat to Create the New Majority and Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?

COPYRIGHT 2016 CREATORS.COM




Establishment Study on Chemtrails Has Not Stymied Activists

An international team of court scientists released a study earlier in August dismissing claims that so-called chemtrails from airplanes exist and are sickening people around the world. Activists and environmentalists have not lost heart, though, and are still moving ahead with lawsuits and legislation to expose this toxic global program.

By Mark Anderson

Establishment scientists may be doing all they can to undermine legitimate research into so-called chemtrails—those toxic chemical trails left behind by airplanes high up in the atmosphere—but that has not taken the wind of out of activists’ sails. Citizens across America are still working to get to the bottom of what exactly has been filling our skies and allegedly making many people sick.

According to the mainstream media, an international team released a study pooh-poohing the theory that a secret large-scale atmospheric program, or SLAP, is in place intended to affect the health of humans and the environment.

AFP reported on this study on Aug. 19.

Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More . . .

But there is some good news out there.

On Feb.12, 2015, the so-called Geoengineering Act of 2015 (H.B. 5480) was introduced into Rhode Island’s General Assembly, which “would demand public disclosure and health and environmental evaluations of any geoengineering activities.” As of May 2015, it was held for further study.

Under its “declaration of geoengineering policy,” it says: “The . . . assembly declares that while the use of geoengineering to address climate change and global warming is a topic worthy for both scientific and other public investigation and debate, its implementation and use should be strictly regulated . . . at this time. Such regulation must include the opportunity for input and comment from the general public, as well as from the medical, environmental, and scientific communities.”

The bill added, “Tests must be performed on a continuous basis to ascertain levels of proposed and known chemicals, particles, gases, metals, other compounds, and materials to ensure that these programs are not implemented without public consent.”



 

The state legislation died in committee last year, but there is hope that legislators will revisit the measure this year.

In addition, in early 2016, a mass-tort environmental class-action lawsuit was brought in the Federal Court of Canada “on behalf of all affected Canadians in respect of aerial discharges performed directly or indirectly by Her Majesty the Queen and/or her instrumentalities, in Canadian air space, and which aerial discharges are alleged to compromise cognitive function, contribute to other neurological disorders, damage property and the environment, among . . . other . . . damage,” Dr. J. Marvin Herndon, a geophysicist, informed AFP.

35_36_NL_CHEMTRAIL_BOOK

The noted website “Geoengineering Watch,” which watchdogs this issue, had urged Canadian attorneys to take up this issue and believes its efforts have paid off.

Mark Anderson is AFP’s roving editor.




Zika Cure Worse than the Disease

A number of health experts are calling into question why exactly U.S. officials have been turning to highly toxic pesticides that are known to cause cancer and birth defects to try to combat the Zika virus, which is being spread by mosquitoes.

By James Spounias

On Aug. 4, Miami officials ordered the spraying of naled, an organophosphate pesticide, to kill Zika-carrying mosquitos in the artsy Wynwood district of Miami. Wynwood had several individuals who were said to carry Zika. Some local residents, however, were outraged when they discovered that naled is banned by the European Union as causing an “unacceptable risk to human health,” because it is in a class of pesticides that have dangerous side effects.

Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More . . .

In the United States, naled, among many other organophosphate pesticides, is approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and most state environmental agencies.

A devastating irony is that birth defects—the very thing that naled is supposed to curb by killing Zika-carrying mosquitos—are a side effect of organophosphates.

Organophosphates, to the surprise of many, have been used for decades throughout the United States, long before the Zika fright was brought to America.

On the same day the spraying was initiated, Dr. Naresh Kumar, a professor of public health at the University of Miami, told CBS Miami bluntly that there are risks inherent in using naled but that the concern of some is overblown.

“All [organophosphates] are a neurotoxin, meaning it will directly affect our nervous system,” said Kumar. “It will affect not only the pregnant woman . . . [I]t is also equally (concerning) for children who have asthma and airway disease because when you are spraying in the air, these aerosols stay in the air for at least five days.”

Miami-Dade County, Fla. officials counter that because they are using only small amounts of naled, which is dispersed from airplanes using aerosol-type dispensers, the health risk is low.

Dennis Olle, a Miami attorney and board member of the Miami Chapter of the North American Butterfly Association, made the point that the Aedes aegypti species of mosquitos, said to carry Zika, flies low to the ground and breeds in areas not easily accessible.

“I don’t care what [the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)] says. It’s bad stuff,” Olle told The Miami Herald on Aug. 11. “It’s one thing to call in air strikes, but it’s generally ineffective.”

Puerto Rico is experiencing a significant number of Zika cases, reportedly 1,500 per week. In spite of CDC-backed orders that naled be sprayed in Puerto Rico, outraged Puerto Ricans ultimately blocked the spraying, according to the alternative media weekly Miami New Times.

Dr. Elvia Melendez-Ackerman, an environmental biologist at the University of Puerto Rico’s Rio Piedras campus, wrote a letter urging the mayor of Miami to stop spraying naled.

Dr. Melendez-Ackerman stated: “We all have heard of the intention to fumigate Miami with naled, and with all due respect, we are starting to see in Florida a repeat of what we went through: Public servants not reading the science that is in front of them.”

Melendez-Ackerman told the New Times: “People don’t know all the risks. This degrades into a carcinogen. It’s in the EPA documents.”

National Public Radio (NPR) used the word “mistrust” to characterize Puerto Rico’s refusal to be sprayed in its Aug. 10, report, titled “Puerto Rico’s Efforts to Stop Zika Are Hampered by Mistrust.”

The mayor of San Juan called the spraying “environmental terror,” reported NPR.

NPR spoke with Ralph Rivera Gutierrez, dean of the Graduate School of Public Health at the University of Puerto Rico, who they described as “still irate about the proposed aerial spraying.”

Gutierrez told NPR, “To go and spray the entire country, based on the limited scientific evidence of the association [between Zika and microcephaly]—that is outrageous to us.”

“We are an invaded country,” Gutierrez explained. “We’ve been a colony of the U.S. for 118 years, and there’s been a lot of experimentation done on us. And so people have had enough of that.”



 

There are many studies connecting pesticides to birth defects and cardiovascular, cognitive, and respiratory complications, according to public interest group Beyond Pesticides. Many of the studies were done on infants whose parents either worked on or lived close to agricultural areas, where organophosphate exposure is acute.

Critics of organophosphate use point out that studies only look at acute exposure, not long-term effects.

In a July 18, 2013 article entitled “Organophosphates: A Common But Deadly Pesticide,” National Geographic reported that the EPA conducts “ecotox” studies of short-term exposure risks.

Exposure scientist Dana Boyd Barr of Atlanta’s Emory University told National Geographic, “This chronic low-level exposure that we all might be exposed to (and which is considered safe in the U.S.) could functionally decrease the neurological capacity of children.”

Large amounts of organophosphates are deadly, having the same mechanism as sarin nerve gas. They are deemed “junior-strength nerve agents,” according to Boyd.

Dying by organophosphates is “a painful way to die,” Boyd said. “You end up suffocating because you are essentially paralyzed.”

It’s not terribly comforting knowing minute amounts of a deadly compound are being sprayed to kill mosquitos and the best assurance is that just because we don’t drop dead immediately after being sprayed, everything is hunky-dory.

Jon Rappoport, a blogger whose reporting on Zika attracted much attention, referred on Aug. 13 to the 2014 CHARGE study, which stands for “Childhood Autism Risks from Genetics and the Environment” and was published in Environmental Health Perspectives. That study found newborns whose carrying mothers lived within a mile of organophosphates during pregnancy were associated with a 60% greater risk of developing Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). The study states, “This study of ASD strengthens the evidence linking neurodevelopmental disorders with gestational pesticide exposures, particularly organophosphates. . . .”

Florida Gov. Rick Scott, via his wife, Ann, has an undisclosed interest in a mosquito-control company named Mosquito Control Services (MCS). This connection is through a private investment firm she co-owns with him, according to Dan Christensen of Floridabulldog.org.

While it is not known if any of the $26.2 million in emergency funds allocated to Zika preparedness by Scott’s June 23, 2016 executive order went to MCS, Floridians who oppose spraying may find themselves with a less than receptive audience in Florida’s executive branch. Christensen reported that MCS did not reply to two of his requests for comment.

The bottom line remains that the connection between the Zika virus and mosquito transmission is less than certain, as Dean Gutierrez noted.

Microcephaly, in a whopping 25,000 cases in the U.S., has been found to potentially be brought about by “any insult that disturbs brain growth and can be seen in association with hundreds of genetic syndromes.”

Donate to us

The high number of U.S. cases of microcephaly in the absence of Zika is perhaps best explained by the fact that even the establishment has confessed—in Orwellian speak—that “to a disturbing extent infants are born ‘pre-polluted,’ ” as has been reported by this writer in American Free Press.

Is Zika hysteria fueled for propaganda purposes, such as distraction from other events, or to serve as a sort of soft mind-control weapon by keeping people in a perpetual state of terror and fear? Or is Zika mania laying the groundwork for implementation of Big Government, pharma, and chemical solutions that will rip away at our liberty, health, and treasure?

Time will tell.

James Spounias is the president of Carotec Inc., originally founded by renowned radio show host and alternative health expert Tom Valentine.




Victor Thorn’s Best Friend Bares All

A PERSONAL NOTE . . .
FROM PETE PAPAHERAKLES

On Monday morning, I received a phone call that completely turned my world upside down. Nothing could have prepared me for it. The call was from Victor’s son, Josh, informing me that Victor had just committed suicide.

I felt like a truck had just run over me. Was this some kind of a practical joke? Was it a dream? Not Victor. Not in a million years. I had just spoken to him the day before, and he was as happy and cheerful as ever. I had packed a surprise present for him and he kept trying to get me to reveal what it was.

“You’ll find out soon enough,” I’d told him.

Just as I was leaving for the post office on Monday morning, the phone rang. Victor would never find out what the present was.

Josh informed me that I was the first person he called outside the immediate family. Per Victor’s post-mortem instructions he requested that I be the one to write his obituary article.

“What am I supposed to write?” I exclaimed in my grief and anger. “That he was an idiot for going off and killing himself?”

“My dad said you’ll know what to write,” Josh calmly explained.

Victor always did have more faith in me than I do, but I stepped up to the task and penned it with a heavy heart.

Podcast Play Button

I want to personally give my condolences to Victor’s family for their loss—his parents, his son, his brother. I’m sure this has been devastating for them.

I want to start by reiterating that I still feel he was an idiot for killing himself. Not a day has passed since his death that I haven’t called him every name in the book for what he did. He was in the prime of his life and at the peak of his career. He was in perfect health, was happy, and had a great attitude about life. Why would he do such a stupid thing?

Victor caused great pain to his family, friends, and thousands of fans around the world. He was a huge part of AMERICAN FREE PRESS, and he will never be replaced.

On a personal level, Victor was my best friend. We spoke on the phone almost on a daily basis. I loved him like a brother.

His loss has ripped a hole in my heart.

Prominent Political Researcher Victor Thorn Commits Apparent Suicide Near Home

• Family spokesmen strongly deny he was a victim of Bill & Hillary Clinton

By Pete Papaherakles

On the morning of August 1, AMERICAN FREE PRESS received news that investigative reporter and prolific author Victor Thorn was dead. Victor always marched to his own beat. He lived life on his own terms and chose to die on his own terms. We might not agree with how he went about it, but Victor was never one to seek approval anyway.

Although raised as a Catholic, his understanding about spiritual matters was light years beyond any organized religion, having read hundreds of books on religion and philosophy. He even wrote many of his own books on these subjects. Victor was not terribly concerned about any moral judgment of his deed either by a god or by any religious moralists. He offered no apologies to anyone.

Victor will be remembered as one of the giants in the alternative media. In his own chapbook, Conspiracy Hall of Fame, Victor inducted about 20 top conspiracy writers of all time. The heavyweights listed included George Orwell, Jim Keith, and Michael Collins Piper. However, Victor needs to be inducted at the very top of the list with the best of them. Who else can boast of having written 60 books?

Since Victor’s death, many conspiracy theories have popped up across the Internet about Victor possibly having been murdered by the Clintons, because of his books exposing their crimes. Others have their own theories.

However, it is important to state the family remains adamant that there is no basis in truth to these charges.

The world may not know exactly why Victor took his own life, but some of us have a general idea. Victor had planned this for at least two years. His son, Josh, even knew the exact day it would happen. That day was on Victor’s 54th birthday. It had to be on that particular birthday, according to Victor’s way of looking at things. He even wrote a book about it, which Josh is now in the process of going over. Details about the book are unclear at this point, but it was Victor’s intention that the book be published eventually.

It seems Victor has managed to be even more provocative and controversial in death than he was in life. From a young age, Victor had determined that he would not grow old. In addition, the timing he chose had to do with his perceived destiny due to his birthday of 8-1-1962, which makes him a triple nine, 999, something he considered unique.

No one knew Victor better than his son and only child, Josh, who lived in the same house with him for the last 20 years.

Josh has read every single book his father wrote and had countless conversations with Victor on these topics.



 

The following statement was released by Josh. Here is what he had to say about his dad’s life, death, legacy, and character:

My dad was a truth-seeker. At his innermost core, he was an artist, a writer, a creator, and a philosopher. For him, his own destruction served as his greatest creative expression, the taking of his own life the ultimate expression of free will.

His purpose for writing, be it political or philosophical, was to knock down walls. What he wanted was for people to seek the truth without any boundaries or dogma, to strip away any kind of programming or conditioning put there by others, and to think about things for themselves.

My father viewed knowledge as the key to freedom. To him, the mind is an extremely powerful thing. If you put seeds in, they’ll grow. The key to Victor was, who’s putting in the seeds? Outside forces that seek to control and manipulate, or inner forces that seek self-knowledge and personal growth? That’s what his writing was about.

Ultimately, he was a rebel. He rebelled against the status quo, against the enemies of truth. His collective work stands as a monument to anyone who dares to peek behind the curtain, even if it means turning everything you think you know upside down.

He will be greatly missed.

Unlike most researchers who specialize in issues within a certain niche, Victor was multi-dimensional in his writing, equally proficient in exposing the 9-11 deception, the Clinton crimes, and the Obama lies as he was in explaining quantum physics and parallel universes. The breadth of his knowledge and understanding, his thirst for the truth, and his enthusiasm for exposing lies and deception were boundless.

Victor’s brother, Bill, in an interview with AFP two days after Victor’s death gave much insight into Victor’s life. He noted that when Victor was in school he had scored in the top 1% in the state of Pennsylvania, a fact that Victor never mentioned.

Based on AFP’s work with Victor over the years, it was clear Victor was at the genius level. He was also extremely well read. His books and articles are a testament to this fact.

Victor had the unique talent of “putting the hay where the goats can get to it,” an expression often used by another good friend and AFP writer who left us too soon, the late, great Jim Traficant. Victor could take any subject, no matter how complex, study it in record time, and present it to his readers in a comprehensible, exciting, easy-to-understand manner.

Victor’s legacy is the enormous body of work he left us. In the 60-some books he penned, he explores in depth a tremendous array of subjects ranging from basic NWO conspiracies to the very nature of reality itself. His expose on the Holocaust fraud is one of the best books on the subject. However, he also wrote many books on art, cinema, entertainment, and music.

Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More . . .

But, most of all, Victor loved America. He loved baseball, hot dogs, the American flag, rock-and-roll, and small-town America, and he adored his dog, Midas.

The basic drive behind his writing was to expose the hidden forces at work destroying the America he knew and loved. In this, he was exactly like legends Willis Carto, Traficant, and Piper, whose combined losses recently have been hard for AFP. And, yet, this newspaper continues to carry on their legacy nonetheless.

Like these other great men, Victor was a legend, and, like them, he will live on forever through the extensive number of books he left behind.

Victor’s books will forever haunt the New World Order. Largely due to Victor’s brilliant research, Hillary Clinton has not been able to conceal her crimes. Through Victor’s tireless work, Donald Trump just might be the next president, and, if so, Victor will have succeeded in saving the America he so much loved.

Farewell, Victor. You will always be remembered.

Donate to us

Pete Papaherakles is a writer and political cartoonist for AFP and is also AFP’s outreach director. Pete is interested in getting AFP writers and editors on the podium at patriotic events. Call him at 202-544-5977 if you know of an event you think AFP should attend.




Clinton Gets Off, U.S. Navy Sailor Gets 1 Year Behind Bars for Taking 6 Photos

• Prosecution of sailor reveals glaring inequity of U.S. judicial system.

By the Staff at AFP

In a shocking legal case that underscores the fact that there are at least two sets of rules in the United States, one for us and one for them, a U.S. Navy sailor who took a total of six photos of the interior of the nuclear submarine he served aboard was sentenced to one year in prison, given a $100 fine, six months home confinement, 100 hours of community service and a ban on owning guns.

Contrast the justice meted out to Kristian Saucier, a patriotic American serving his country in the U.S. Navy, to the justice not meted out to Hillary Clinton, for mishandling 113 emails—22 Top Secret and 65 Secret—while U.S. Secretary of State.

Crowning_Clinton_Color_Cover250

Softcover, 118 pages

Buy Book Button

Saucier, 29, of Arlington, Vermont, plead guilty on May 27, 2016 to one count of unauthorized possession and retention of national defense information. He admitted to taking six photos inside the USS Alexandria (SSN-757), a Los Angeles-class nuclear-powered fast-attack submarine, in 2009 when he was 22-years-old. “The photos were deemed ‘confidential,’ the lowest level for classification,” reported U.S. News & World Report.

Saucier’s attorneys argued that Clinton had been “engaging in acts similar to Mr. Saucier” with information of much higher classification. They argued that it would be “unjust and unfair for Mr. Saucier to receive any sentence other than probation for a crime those more powerful than him will likely avoid.”

After sentencing, one of Saucier’s defense attorneys commented that “it could be argued here that depending on what your name is, that’s the type of justice you get in the United States.”

Really? You think?



 

Donate to us

Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More . . .




Black Professor Suspended for Stating Opinions

• Professor suspended for posting thoughts on 9-11, Israel.

By John Friend —

Dr. Joy Karega, an assistant professor of rhetoric and composition at Oberlin College, a prestigious liberal arts college in Ohio, has been placed on paid administrative leave following an investigation related to her social media posts, university officials recently announced.

Professor Karega made national headlines earlier this year when a number of her controversial social media posts were publicized by the media. The Oberlin College professor, who is black, made numerous Facebook posts which were deemed to be anti-Semitic and promoting “conspiracy theories.”

Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More . . .

In her posts, Ms. Karega opined Israel played a key role in the events of 9-11 and also argued that ISIS was a joint Central Intelligence Agency-Mossad creation designed to stage even more September 11-style false-flag attacks. In other posts, Ms. Karega expressed her support for the Palestinian cause and pointed out that the notorious Jewish banker Jacob Rothschild, among other elite money lenders and international financiers, “own your news, the media, your oil, and your government.”

University officials, including Oberlin College President Marvin Krislov, who is Jewish, originally defended Ms. Karega’s controversial posts and her right to freedom of expression while distancing the university from her views.

“I believe, as the American Association of University Professors says, that academic freedom is ‘the indispensable quality of institutions of higher education’ because it encourages free inquiry, promotes the expansion of knowledge, and creates an environment in which learning and research can flourish,” Krislov wrote in a letter publicly released shortly after Ms. Karega’s posts initially garnered widespread media attention. “Cultivating academic freedom can be difficult and at times painful for any college community. The principles of academic freedom and freedom of speech are not just principles to which we turn to face these challenges, but also the very practices that ensure we can develop meaningful responses to prejudice.”

MadeInIsraelRS

PDF, 98 pages, $10

Buy PDF Button

Unsurprisingly, Krislov has backtracked on his initial support for Ms. Karega, likely as a result of heavy pressure from the pro-Israel community and other enforcers of political correctness.

Following the media coverage of Ms. Karega’s social media posts, leading Jewish politicians and activists, including New York State Assemblyman Dov Hikind, demanded that Oberlin College fire Ms. Karega. Hikind, an Orthodox Jew, even insisted U.S. presidential hopefuls of both political parties “stand up against this kind of hatred.”

“I truly hope the leaders of America will see [fit] to address this atrocity and will send a clear-cut message that anti-Semitism and any form of hatred won’t be tolerated,” Hikind stated.



 

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and other Jewish organizations met with Oberlin College officials in early March “to address the seriousness of the anti-Semitic views shared on social media by Assistant Professor Joy Karega,” according to an ADL article. “During the meeting, potential implications of espousing such extreme personal views, and how these sentiments have the potential to create an atmosphere where students feel uncomfortable, were discussed.”

Given the immense influence Jewish and pro-Israel organizations wield in American society, which was demonstrated quite clearly in this particular case, university officials have decided to suspend Ms. Karega’s professorial duties. Krislov added that this will take place until “an equitable review process” has been completed.

“While the process is pending, Professor Karega is on paid leave and will not be teaching at Oberlin,” he announced. “Arrangements are being made to cover her teaching and advising responsibilities.”

Despite the rational and legitimate views expressed by the professor, it is highly unlikely she will be asked to return to her teaching duties.

Numerous independent researchers, journalists, and scholars, including the late Victor Thorn, have conclusively demonstrated that Israel and an international network of pro-Israel criminals planned, organized, and benefited from the events of 9-11. More recently, alternative and independent analysts have posited that ISIS is tied to Israeli and Western intelligence agencies, views Ms. Karega expressed publicly but has now been punished severely for doing.

Ms. Karega did not respond to email requests for comment before AFP went to press.

Donate to us

John Friend is a writer who lives in California.




Death by Doctor: A Hidden Holocaust

• More than 250,000 people killed every year by doctors’ mistakes in U.S. alone.

By James Spounias —

Medical errors are the third leading cause of death in the United States, according to Dr. Martin A. Makary, a professor of surgery at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, whose study detailing death-by-mistake was recently published in The BMJ, formerly the British Medical Journal.

Alarmingly, 251,454 people die each year—nearly 700 a day—from preventable medical mistakes, accounting for 9.5% of all deaths annually in the U.S., according to The Washington Post.

Heart disease and cancer are the top two causes of death, responsible for 614,348 and 591,699 annual deaths respectively, and respiratory disease is the number four killer, causing 147,101 deaths per year.

DeathInTheUS400

Makary told the Post for the May 3 article, “It boils down to people dying from the care that they receive rather than the disease for which they are seeking care.”

Mistakes are attributed to incompetence, communication breakdown, and bureaucratic bungling.

If dying from medical error isn’t bad enough, what may be more shocking is an estimate that serious injury caused by error may account for 40 times the number of deaths, according to Frederick van Pelt, a doctor with the Chartis Group, a healthcare consultancy firm, reported the Post.

If van Pelt’s estimation is near accurate, this means that more than 10 million Americans are seriously injured each year by medical errors. That’s a significant amount of misery visited upon a massive number of people.

What adds insult to injury is the high cost Americans pay for healthcare.

Healthcare costs were roughly $3.2 trillion in 2015, according to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). That’s about $10,000 per American, making up 17.5% of the nation’s gross domestic product.

Americans spend much more on healthcare compared to other first-world nations.

The Dallas Morning News writer Jim Landers reported in a 13-part series titled “Cost of Care: The U.S. healthcare system is bleeding green” that in 2013, per-person cost of healthcare in Canada was $4,602, $5,178 in the Netherlands, $6,758 in Norway, $6,080 in Switzerland, $3,183 in Italy, $4,884 in Germany, and $2,411 in South Korea versus $9,255 in the U.S.

There are many reasons why Americans pay more—as much as 3.5 times more—than other first-world countries.

This is because the American healthcare regulatory scheme is neither “free market” nor “socialistic” but rather, monopolistic, allowing massive profits for a few with little competition or incentive to cut costs.

Those who think that America’s healthcare system is “free market” should take a sober look at the massive regulation that restricts market entry, including state licensure that limits the number of physicians and hospitals, the federal government’s drug and device approval process, and regulations on health insurance companies, especially those added in response to the Obamacare mandate guaranteeing that Americans buy health insurance.

One glaring example of monopolistic business practice involves the approval of drugs. The cost to bring a single drug from development to market in 2016 is a staggering $2.558 billion, according to the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development. Nonetheless, Big Pharma’s profits are astronomical. Pfizer, among the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies, made a huge 42% profit in 2013.

Only the secretive Federal Reserve System tops healthcare in terms of profit and privilege.

In America, most working people pay for “private” healthcare insurance, now a mandate under Obamacare, plus Medicare, also mandatory. This makes America exceptional in the sense that citizens are obligated to pay twice for allopathic care insurance premiums that enrich a few fat cats and provide make-work for a significant part of the employment sector.

Given that Americans pay much more than other high-income countries, one should be able to assume that at least we are healthier and living longer than our counterparts. Not a chance.

In almost every statistic, Americans live shorter and unhealthier lives than our counterparts, and this cuts among all racial, ethnic, and educational lines, according to a 2013 report by the National Research Council, the research arm of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.



 

Dr. Steven H. Woolf, the lead author of the report, told National Public Radio (NPR) in a January 9, 2013 interview, “What struck us—and it was quite sobering—was the recurring trend in which the U.S. seems to be slipping behind other high-income countries.”

Woolf also told NPR, “People with seemingly everything going for them still live shorter lives and have higher disease rates than people in other countries.”

The report noted, “The health disadvantage is pervasive—it affects all age groups up to age 75 and is observed for multiple diseases, biological and behavioral risk factors, and injuries.”

Is it any surprise the mainstream elite media, politicians, and pundits keep us in the dark regarding medical mistakes, let alone the larger picture of our bleak healthcare system, reflecting ill health from cradle to grave?

Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More . . .

If you only listen to the controlled media, you’d think the chances are high you’re going to die at the hand of a Muslim terrorist. In reality, as of May 2016, overdoses on Tylenol have killed more people than Muslim terrorists in the U.S.

And while the left-wing-controlled media rants about gun violence, pointing to Chicago as an example of the need for gun control, that city’s gun violence problem is arguably tied to the illegal drug trade brought about by the prohibition of drugs.

The staggering problem of medical mistakes—251,454 deaths and 10 million serious injuries annually—should be at the forefront of our minds rather than Muslim terrorism or gun control.

How America got so unhealthy—from food to environmental assault to poor quality healthcare—should be explored to its fullest.

Donate to us

James Spounias is the president of Carotec Inc., originally founded by renowned radio show host and alternative health expert Tom Valentine and his wife, Carole. To receive a free issue of Carotec Health Report—a monthly newsletter loaded with well-researched and reliable alternative health information—please write Carotec, P.O. Box 9919, Naples, FL 34101 or call 1-800-522-4279. Also included will be a list of the high-quality health supplements Carotec recommends.